Understanding Why Your multiprocessing Function Doesn’t Print in Python

Learn why your Python `multiprocessing` function isn't printing output as expected and how to fix it, especially when working with editors like Spyder.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Function does not print in multiprocessing

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Your multiprocessing Function Doesn’t Print in Python

When working with Python’s multiprocessing module, you might encounter unexpected behavior, such as a function executing but not printing any output. This issue can be tricky, especially if you're new to handling processes. In this guide, we will explore a common problem related to printing output in a multiprocessing environment and how to solve it.

The Problem: Missing Output from do_something Function

Let's dive into a specific case. Consider this Python code that uses the multiprocessing module to perform a simple task with five sleep intervals:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Observed Behavior

When this code is executed in an environment like Spyder, you may notice that while the function sleeps and completes successfully, it does not print the output from the print statement inside do_something:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Expected Output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

So, what’s causing this lack of output?

Understanding the Reason for Missing Prints

The main reason for this behavior revolves around how the standard output (stdout) is handled in your development environment.

Process Inheritance: The child processes created by ProcessPoolExecutor do not inherit the special stdout that Spyder redirects. Each process has its own standard output stream, leading to prints in those processes not appearing in your Spyder console.

Different Behaviors: If you run the same code from a command line (outside of Spyder), each process’s output displays correctly because they inherit the terminal's stdout.

How to Fix the Issue

Here are a couple of ways to fix and properly display outputs while using the multiprocessing library:

1. Use Command-Line Execution

If you're testing scripts that heavily rely on multiprocessing, consider running them from a command line interface rather than in an IDE like Spyder. This allows all print statements to flow directly to your terminal.

2. Use Logging

Instead of relying on print, using the logging module is another effective approach. The logging module is more versatile and can be configured to write outputs to files or streams that can be easily accessed later.

Here’s a modified version of your function using logging:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Print from the Main Process

If you want to keep using print, you could gather results and send a final print statement from the main process. This will ensure that you capture outputs as needed.

Conclusion

Working with multiprocessing can be complex, especially when facing issues with output visibility. Understanding how different processes handle their own outputs is crucial for debugging. Whether you decide to use command-line execution or employ logging, these approaches can help clear up confusion and make your code work as intended.

Next time you're puzzled by silent outputs in your multiprocessing scripts, leverage these insights for improved troubleshooting. Happy coding!