Judge rules Amendment D is void, will still appear on ballot

A judge has ruled that Amendment D is void, but it will still remain on the ballot.

[samueleborn]

I’m still voting no regardless of if it counts

[DarkPesco]

Must be a station run entirely by interns. They did a lousy job of even explaining what the amendment is...much less the story about it. Horrible job, here...

[TheRealScooterGuy]

I'm not in your state. Your description of Amendment D was as clear as mud. (Not sure why this showed up in my feed.)

That said, the Utah News Dispatch explained it quite well. I'd encourage anyone in the Beehive State to vote against that amendment, if you want citizen initiatives to remain a viable way of changing things the legislature refuses to look at.

So the vote won't count this time? Vote against it anyway. Your votes will send a strong message to your legislature to leave this constitutionally-protected right alone.

[DeadCat-]

Voters still don't know what it actually is.

[justinsternhagen]

By those same standards isn't the law vague as well? What are the exact exemptions?

[StevenBloomfield]

The judge D blocked them! No D for you!

[QuiltLady]

States use language that make it difficult to discern a clear yes or no so you might vote against your own best interest.

[grampydeathblade]

They're not going to count them (wink wink)

[SarinaSazi]

I don't understand what ammendment D is? You think they would make it clear

[germainjodoin]

Bad taste in your apparel, bud lol 😂😂

[bspoon]

So basically they won't let the citizens of the state make decisions for themselves?

[Rick-npvz]

Legislation from the bench is supposed to be unconstitutional!

[XenaphobeJoe-nj]

A woman judge removing women's rights. As a white man, explain that to me .