Vinhos 2010 Review - with Chris and Wendy Yi

Chris Yi and Wendy Yi take a look at the original printing of Vinhos, the first published title by Vital Lacerda. While this printing is not in production anymore, these same rules are an optional mode of the 2016 Eagle Gryphon printing.

00:00 Intro
00:35 Overview
11:04 Review
20:56 Outro

Support the channel by becoming a member!

Check out the friendliest conventions on Earth!

[boardgameknight]

Chris and Wendy take on another Lacerda game! Whoo Whoo! Love these heavy reviews! Also, really happy to hear Wendy put the Viticulture comparison to rest right away - totally what I was thinking.

[szulgitgk]

Awesome summary in just a few minutes! (other videos go into the rules in great depth; too much?). The commentary is also spot on, though I think it is worth suggesting that the reason that players need to pay to land on a space with another player is not to tighten the economy, but to add variety in the players' strategies--otherwise they might all end up doing the same actions.

[brmassa]

Yi's, great chemistry! Quite comprehensive review! Congrats!! Chris, maybe it was my eye, but I felt the color grading was oscillating back and forth from orange-ish to a blue-ish (for example, around 12:00).

[christianbank]

Awesome! looking forward to your review of the 2016 version.

[lonewolfvc]

I think the 2016 deluxe edition never came out, right?

[EfrainRiveraJunior]

For a moment there I thought this was the new expansion for Viticulture.

[JohnBystrom]

Is it just me, or is the color temperature going up and down in the review?

[JefferyHunt]

The criticisms Chris makes leads me to believe he’d prefer the 2016 variant.

[KissellMissile]

I missed the bank in the 2016 version, then I played both versions back to back and realized it is just a waste. The money is too tight to really invest in the bank I feel.

[jasong]

Totally agree about the bank! Unnecessary. I almost exclusively play heavy games so it isn't a "it's too hard" situation but rather it feels added on for complexity sake. This isn't an economic game with stocks so I don't know why we are investing and divesting money. I think the 2016 version is better but most people don't agree.

[waferjuice]

7.5 is a seal of approval ?? what the rating is that..