$6000 Leica Camera was beaten by an iPhone (sometimes)

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, I compare Apple's brand new iPhone 15 Pro to my $6000 Leica Q2 Camera. I think it's fun to take a look at how well the iPhones keep up to a pro camera. Did you expect such a result from the iPhone 15 Pro vs. Pro Camera comparison?

New pictures every other day:

Random and personal thoughts:

#iphone15pro #leicaq2 #photography
____________________________________________________________

Professional Background Music:

____________________________________________________________

0:00 Introduction
0:37 First Impressions
1:50 Side by Side Comparison

With "📷" marked links are affiliate links. When you buy something with the help of this link, I will get a small commission. There aren't additional costs for you.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Did you expect such a result and would you consider using only a phone as your main camera?

janwinter.mp
Автор

That is closer than I expected! I feel like average people won’t really notice a big difference. Great video!

Lifeneverlost
Автор

I've owned dozens of cameras from Leica, Nikon and Fuji over the years and recently went on a European holiday with just a Q2 and my iPhone. Honestly, I was shocked at how much better the iPhone was at everything except portraits - even low light. My biggest gripe with using the phone as a main camera is using a touch screen rather than a physical shutter button. I might need to take a quick shot and finding the shutter button on the screen is a PITA especially if you're in bright sun or the camera has switched modes to something you don't want, like Pano or Movie.

stevewalsh
Автор

People have to be really honest how they look at the pictures. I would confidently say that 80% of people use only the smartphone to check pictures. On top of that, people do not tend to upload pictures full quality to the cloud. There is also quality reduction. And, even fewer are looking for specific details in the pictures. In my opinion, dedicated cameras are a niche market. Pictures from a phone today never been so awesome.

enriqueruiz
Автор

Well now, perhaps an iPhone 11 would be more fair as a comparison? That would only have a 12mp sensor. Otherwise, maybe compare the iPhone 15 to the 60mp Q3? Would love to see that.

matthewtan
Автор

Ok, this looks interesting and unique, but why do you actually shoot 4:3? It’s not very comfortable to watch on a 21:9 display 😅

ululeshechka
Автор

Holy I love your edit and the 4:3 video uGHHH

nikewray
Автор

I did with my wife using a 20 inch monitor using a I phone 15 and a x100v and she knows zero about photography. Out of 10 photos She easily could tell the difference between the ten photos when came two cameras. When I asked what it was that made the two different? She said it was something in the texture of the I phone photos that was very noticeable that gave it a plastic look compared to the Fuji.

WhoIsSerafin
Автор

The best smartphone cameras are impressive for being so tiny, but compared to dedicated cameras they are miles away, especially when taking photos of human subjects. When you watch comparisons online, it looks so much closer than it actually is. In reality the difference is night and day, even the cheapest pocket cameras sold today are miles better. Phones are way too over-processed, completely lacking the sharpness and DoF of dedicated cameras... and so much more. If you're not serious about photography and just need bright, colourful and high contrast photos for your social media, then a smartphone will do the trick. If photography is your thing, then get a camera (even a budget camera will do) and proper objectives suited for your style of photography.

beGee
Автор

Challenging topic, upbeat tone, and effective pics and graphics, Jan. Nice. I think you hit on some key points. Shooting experience and final results are important, but so is how the final image will be used — commercial or personal use — IMO. Computational photography goes a long way in smartphones to make up for shortcomings. Smartphone image editing apps, even the limited default apps that come built in, make for convenience and creativity, not to mention ease of instantly sending an image anywhere in the world. Camera makers would be wise to built in some smartphone electronics. Agree?
Simpler gear, high quality optics, and IQ have their own lasting appeal. Cheers!

paulm
Автор

A very silly competition . The color sharpness and depth is a million time s they of a silly eyephone

How big can you print .. forgot they

TheGoldsholl