Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE - The Overturning of Junk DNA!

#creation #evolution #science #genetics #debate #apologetics #christianity #youngearth #intelligentdesign

There exists powerful evidence for genome-wide functionality. The ENCODE project (and subsequent projects) has revealed that at least 80% of the genome is active to some extent (biochemical activity). We have also learned that about 60% of the genome is transcribed into RNA. These findings were a surprise to those in the evolutionary camp that expect the human genome to be a reflection of evolutionary history. If common descent were true, we should be finding genomes of junk, and evolutionary leftovers. But this is not what we find.

Militant evolutionists argue that the greater majority of this activity is simply spurious or noise. This argument is easily refuted. Transcription is an energy and resource intensive processes. Every time a single nucleotide as added to a growing RNA chain, the cell us utilizing energy. This would be incredibly wasteful of energy and resources if this genomic activity was simply noise. The large amount of transcripts produced would clutter up the interior of the cell if they were not involved in important operational roles.

If guardians of common descent were correct on this matter, and most of the genome was non-functional (many evolutionary scientists argue the genome is only 10% functional!), natural selection should have been able to weed out a lot of this junk over time. There should also exist mechanisms to suppress this activity if the activity were merely spurious. Transcribing a large portion of the genome for non-functional reasons should be minimized. This tells us that the transcription, and activity, is beneficial activity, and not mere noise. This would be akin to buying new clothes weekly and stuffing it into your dresser without ever taking old clothes out to throw out or give away. Your dresser would quickly become a mess. And you would have no choice but to remove older clothes to make for more efficient living.

Transcription factors are proteins that regulate the transcription of genes (copying into RNA). These amazingly designed proteins ensure that the right genes are being expressed in the right cells of the body, and at the right time. If we find high levels of non-specific binding in the genome, you will be titrating out transcription factors. This essentially means the cellular processes won't be able to get the transcription binding that is necessary. Random binding will gum up the operations. This would also go against genomic efficiency. Most of the binding in the genome (which is a lot) must therefore be serving a purpose or else cellular operations would be incredibly messy. The random binding of transcription factors would muck up the systems of the cell. The genome would be a disorganized mess. All of this would create what's called an interference problem. There are limited transcription factor copies that can be produced. If transcription factors are only binding randomly (noise) to various sites in the genome, there isn't going to be enough transcription factors available to actually do the type of binding that is important for healthy cell processes.

In summary. there exist numerous good scientific reasons for why the biochemical activity found in the human genome is functional and useful activity. Since the evidence strongly suggests that the majority of the genome is functional (somewhere between 60 and 85%), and the mutation rate is high (roughly 100 new mutations per person per generation), evolution (the theory of evolution and not simply change over time) cannot be true. It cannot be true because too many deleterious mutations are accumulating every generation. This puts shelf lives on genomes. This limits forward evolution. In other words, large-scale evolution is impossible!

To Support the Ministry:

Standing For Truth Ministries OFFICIAL Website:
Support Standing For Truth:

Interviews Hosted by Standing For Truth:

Debates hosted/moderated by Standing For Truth:

[StandingForTruthMinistries]

There exists powerful evidence for genome-wide functionality. The ENCODE project (and subsequent projects) has revealed that at least 80% of the genome is active to some extent (biochemical activity). We have also learned that about 60% of the genome is transcribed into RNA. These findings were a surprise to those in the evolutionary camp that expect the human genome to be a reflection of evolutionary history. If common descent were true, we should be finding genomes of junk, and evolutionary leftovers. But this is not what we find.

Militant evolutionists argue that the greater majority of this activity is simply spurious or noise. This argument is easily refuted. Transcription is an energy and resource intensive process. Every time a single nucleotide as added to a growing RNA chain, the cell is utilizing energy. This would be incredibly wasteful of energy and resources if the activity taking place in the genome was simply noise. The large amount of transcripts produced would clutter up the interior of the cell if they were not involved in important operational roles.

If guardians of common descent were correct on this matter, and most of the genome was non-functional (many evolutionary scientists argue the genome is only 10% functional!), natural selection should have been able to weed out a lot of this junk over time. There should also exist mechanisms to suppress this activity (if the activity were merely spurious). Transcribing a large portion of the genome for non-functional reasons should be minimized. This tells us that the transcription, and activity, is beneficial, and not mere noise. This would be akin to buying new clothes weekly and stuffing it into your dresser without ever taking old clothes out to throw out or give away. Your dresser would quickly become a mess. And you would have no choice but to remove older clothes to make for more efficient living.

Transcription factors are proteins that regulate the transcription of genes (copying into RNA). These amazingly designed proteins ensure that the right genes are being expressed in the right cells of the body, and at the right time. If we find high levels of non-specific binding in the genome, you will be titrating out transcription factors. This essentially means the cellular processes won't be able to get the transcription binding that is necessary. Random binding will gum up the operations. This would also go against genomic efficiency. Most of the binding in the genome (which is a lot) must therefore be serving a purpose or else cellular operations would be incredibly messy. The random binding of transcription factors would muck up the systems of the cell. The genome would be a disorganized mess. All of this would create what's called an interference problem. There are limited transcription factor copies that can be produced. If transcription factors are only binding randomly (noise) to various sites in the genome, there isn't going to be enough transcription factors available to actually do the type of binding that is important for healthy cell processes.

In summary. there exist numerous good scientific reasons for why the biochemical activity found in the human genome is functional and useful activity. Since the evidence strongly suggests that the majority of the genome is functional (somewhere between 60 and 85%), and the mutation rate is high (roughly 100 new mutations per person per generation), evolution (the theory of evolution and not simply change over time) cannot be true. It cannot be true because too many deleterious mutations are accumulating every generation. This puts shelf lives on genomes. This limits forward evolution. In other words, large-scale evolution is impossible!

[Call_Me_Emo]

Bro is back to using *"Functional"* in two different context within the same argument.

[docsmith]

You are painfully ignorant about how DNA and mutations function. You look at mutations as “errors, ” but they are actually simple changes in the genome that will perpetuate if they prove to be beneficial to the organism and will cease if the organism dies from the mutation.

[coloredred]

Look at the babies born during Covid! What do you call it?

[georgeszweden]

Evolution went from theory to joke quick in the past few years

[newcreationinchrist]

Very interesting, brother Donny! God bless you 🙏🙏🙏✝️

[samuelrodriguez]

Amen 🙏 God's word is truth! Better to listen to God than man.

[gregormann]

These shorts would be so much better—more effective not to mention revolutionary—if their producer could just muster the courage be break from the mold and STOP THAT INSUFFERABLE NOISE in the background!! Mature adults can actually listen to words. Just words. Wonderful quiet thoughtful words. But at least there’s no looping drum track. . .(did I just say that out loud?) 😖

[phillipevans]

Why didn't the apostles teach OSAS?
They probably had better things to do.

[phillipevans]

People wouldn't know God's word if it walked off and told therm.