The World's Largest Sand Battery is Coming to Finland!

preview_player
Показать описание
The world's largest sand battery is coming to Finland. With 100 MWh capacity, it can store excess solar/wind energy and cut district heating emissions by 70%. Heat stays at 500°C for months, replacing oil & woodchips.

Or for a one-off contribution you can support by buying a coffee ☕️ here —
The Engineering with Rosie team is:
Rosemary Barnes: presenter, producer, writer
Fatini Nur: Research and production assistant
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm surprised this hasn't gone super sized yet. An oil cistern sized system would hold on the order of 10 GWh of heat. That would work really well for large district heating systems and could take advantage of near zero electricity prices when it is windy in the Nordic market.

zapfanzapfan
Автор

A week's worth of heating for a town stored in a 13x15m construction is suprisingly efficient.

Instead of a street with 20 houses have these batteries and you're basically set for winter

photoo
Автор

I love sand batteries. Such a cool idea.

EnergyCourtier
Автор

It's not a battery, it's a "thermal battery". A battery is a device to store electricity chemically. Using just the word battery is misleading.

barryschwarz
Автор

With that high of a storage temperature, what is the transition material/process to get to hot water? It would seem that if water was exposed to that temperature directly, it would create a flash-to-steam situation that wouldn't do anyone any good.

steve
Автор

If only Aus could store cold for district cooling!

PinataOblongata
Автор

160 tones savings seem very small. Its like 200 households per year.

arran.miller
Автор

Rosie, could you do some "napkin" engineering for us. What kind of home sand battery, solar resistive heated to 500 C in the center during summer, would remain below 100 C on the outside water coil six months later, for winter hydronic heating, to supplement the solar panels? (How far would heat travel in dry sand over 6 months)

dellmerlin
Автор

so it saves 20h worth of 747 flight time in co2....

ncc
Автор

Why not just use a much larger, but lower temp insulated pool of water, at lower temps you could get a cop of 3 so, store 3x as much thermal energy. It would still be cheap and just use a heat pump instead of resistive heater.
I think I need to do some trials…

deanfielding
Автор

G'day,

Yay Team...!

Very innovative, indeed...

I recall reading of the idea that mechanical Energy from a Wind-Turbine was at some point considered as a source if Energy to be stored by mechanically agitating a Tank of Water - aiming to heat the liquid by Friction from Hydrodynamic Drag...

Hot Sand warmed by burried Radiators in parallel vwith a Water Coil through which to extract the stored Heat...

I
LIKE
it...

Keep on keepin' on.

Stay safe.

;-p

Ciao !

WarblesOnALot
Автор

I might have misunderstood but shouldn't it be under ground ?

CHMichael
Автор

Yawn, in Hamburg, Germany, we have had such an energy storage facility with 1, 000 tons of volcanic rock up and running since 2019(!).

hape
Автор

Europe house include heater can use this instead dependency on LNG? Who can comes out with answers

aliandy.jf.nababan
Автор

Pännäinen is not a town.. small village 😅😅

tomasmattsson
Автор

That is not a battery, that is a heat sink.
Not that it is a bad thing, just the wrong name. That's all.

advorak
Автор

Calling BS on the figures. You’re not including CO2 emissions from construction of all new equipment nor manufacturing of equipment.

BOYSWILLBEBOYS
join shbcf.ru