Why Dissidents Say Special Relativity is Wrong

David de Hilster discusses why thousands of critical thinkers the world over say special relativity is wrong. David shows some examples including a video from his father which gives his explanation.

Bob de Hilster Video:

YouTube Channel on Time and Special Relativity:

Autodynamics:

CNPS Database:

[camerontorrance]

The answer to to your "energy increasing but mass not" rhetorical question is that a particles freely moving around (no interactions) has two contributions to it energy or rather the square of the energy - the energy associated with its mass and the energy associated with it's motion. The mass contribution is constant but it is the energy contribution associated with the momentum that increases.

[_John_Sean_Walker]

GPS satellites do not calculate the position of the cars, but the cars calculate the position of the satellites.
The satellites do not calculate the time dilation, but the cars use the difference in the time they receive from the satellites.

[vesuvandoppelganger]

There are 2 contradictory time dilation formulas that can be derived from SR.

If the distance between the light source and the mirror on the ceiling is L and the train moves to the right at c/2, the light travels 2L for the observer inside the train but (√5)L for the observer outside the train for the roundtrip. Since c is the same for both, it takes time 2L/c for the observer inside and time (√5)L/c for the observer outside.

From this we can derive the time dilation formula T=T_o/(√(1-(v^2/c^2))).

Now, when light is shot vertically toward the ceiling but at an angle to the left, say arctan(0.5), and the mirror on the ceiling is moved accordingly to the left to reflect the light correctly, the light travels (√5)L for the observer inside the train but 2L for the observer outside for the roundtrip. Since c is the same for both, it takes time (√5)L/c for the observer inside and time 2L/c for the observer outside.

From this we can derive the time dilation formula T_o=T/(√(1-(v^2/c^2))).

The variables are switched and the formulas are contradicting each other.

This shows that SR is invalid.

[chrisoakey]

The first problem with special relativity is that we are not in a vacuum. And as such light is not going at C. The second is that we are on the same space ship. Not on seperate ones. If you dont believe that, try putting something into space. We therefore have the same frame of reference.
Then, we haven't measured light in one direction. So how do ee justifiy the assumption that everyone sees it at c no doppler effect etc.
The reason GPS uses a bunch of clocks with different decay rates and still get adjusted is because the math doesn't quite work.

[vesuvandoppelganger]

2 ships that are passing each other....

Ship1 at rest at top:

1 light-year


.6 light-year

Ship2 at rest at bottom:

.6 light-year
.8c

1 light-year

The spaceships are each 1 light-year long and are passing each other at .8c. So each ship is contracted to .6 light-year when viewed from the other ship.

T1 and T2 both have a lamp with a lightbulb. Both lamps are initially off. When T1 is lined up with N2, T1 turns on his lamp. When T2 is lined up with N1, T2 turns on his lamp. When T1 turns on his lamp is T2's lamp on or off?

[StuMas]

*I can easily prove SR is wrong using pure logic. Mathematics not required*

[Mantramurtim]

I dont understand how space can grab mass and mass bend space at the same time. Space is nothing, it has no attributes or qualities.

[philweight]

Any man who opens by saying that the limit on the speed of light is wrong because science fiction says otherwise, and that time dilation - which has been experimentally PROVED - is "kooky", cannot be taken seriously. This is a a gentle rant, not a serious examination of SR. If you want to be taken seriously, try offering some intelligent and half-way grown up criticisms and then some alternative ideas to validate your rejection of the theory.

[marianiliev]

Rey Fleming has answers for almost everything .Special Relativity is Wrong.

[wesbaumguardner]

It is pretty easy to disprove both of Einstein's theories by disproving the photon. The equation that quantized light, aka turned it into a photon, is unbalanced and cannot be mathematically true. The equation is E=hv (or E=hf) where E is energy in Joules, h is Planck's constant in Joules*seconds, and v (or f) is the frequency in light in Hertz, or cycles per second. A unit analysis shows which reduces to Joules=Joules*cycles. Theory disproved. The quantization of light is an error. The photon does not exist.