Finally! Scientists find first evidence that black holes are the source of dark energy

This video discusses a groundbreaking new finding in cosmology that could provide an explanation for the mysterious force known as dark energy. A team of researchers from around the world has found evidence that supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies could be the source of this enigmatic energy. The results align with Einstein's theory of gravity and suggest that singularities at the center of black holes may contain vacuum energy that drives the universe's expansion. By studying black hole evolution over nine billion years, the team discovered that the growth of these supermassive black holes is consistent with the existence of dark energy, potentially providing a solution to one of the biggest puzzles in modern physics.

Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope

Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope

Celestron – StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ

Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:

Follow us

Join this channel to get access to these perks:

#NSN #NASA #DarkEnergy #BlackHoles #Cosmology #Einstein #Gravity #Astrophysics #Universe #Research #Observations #SupermassiveBlackHoles #ExpansionOfTheUniverse #CosmicMysteries #Astronomy #Science #Space #STFCRALSpace #ImperialCollegeLondon #UniversityOfHawaii #TheAstrophysicalJournal #TheAstrophysicalJournalLetters #VacuumEnergy #DormantGalaxies #Singularity #Accretion #CosmologicalCoupling #DuncanFarrah #ChrisPearson #DaveClements #Astronomy

[sardarbekomurbekov]

That is mind blowing. Now only thing is to find this matter.

[doodelay]

This is a truly astounding finding if it holds up

[EddySunMusicProbe]

Very useful information!! Many thanks.. Cheers, Eddy.

[kolmaxik]

Well, sounds like potentially nothing

[johnishikawa]

Very interesting. If this bears out, then black holes will take center stage as astrophysicists and astronomers continue to unravel the mysteries of the cosmos. Not bad for an entity - a black hole - initially considered to be a mathematical curiosity spewed up by the equations of general relativity when extreme parameter values are plugged into them. This view was taken by the physicist who derived those equations, by Einstein himself!

[MasterCadDesigns]

According to the study they believe the reason why the supermassive black holes are the source for the expansion occurring to space is because the further they look using telescopes the larger the supermassive black holes appear to be. They assume because the black holes appear to be larger in the early universe might explain why space is expanding so fast today. But the supermassive black holes appear to be larger than they should in the early universe. Then the expansion of space would be decreasing over time because the galaxies today are a whole lot smaller than the ones found in the early universe.

HD1 has a supermassive black hole in it's core weighing an estimated 66 billion solar masses. It's about 13.5 billion light years away, according to it's redshift of 13.2. The galaxy then is about 300 million years old after the big bang, that's if we go by the speed of light and general relativity. The supermassive black hole in our galaxy, Sgr A* is around 4.1 million solar masses in an old universe of 13.7 billion years after the big bang. So the supermassive black holes appear to be getting smaller and smaller over time, not larger and larger, which is what we would expect if the supermassive black holes were growing rapidly as they aged per their hypothesis. The large galaxies in the past are shrinking, losing mass. So, their shrinking as they age should cause space to be contracting, not expanding. Their rhetoric is flawed.

[manojkumarjambla]

One thing for sure. We as universe living form or not, do exist as waves.

[sureshbaliyan]

"Energy can be created only when the applied force is the inherent property of source"

[addllerandrew]

What is the trajectory of galaxies??? Comets have an elliptical path relative to the sun. The moon has an elliptical trajectory relative to the earth. The earth has an elliptical path relative to the sun. If the pattern remains: the sun has an elliptical path relative to the galaxy. So we can assume that the galaxy has an elliptical trajectory relative to a specific point of mass in the universe. Thus, if the galaxies have an elliptical trajectory, depending on the moment, this indicates that there is acceleration in the movement of the galaxies and this could not be computed as the action of dark matter or dark energy.

[liamd]

Well black holes are very dark, so stands to reason they should be the source of dark energy.

[omsingharjit]

See I was right ...
As I said many times to peoples that there's is Relation between black holes dark energy and dark matter .
And now you guys are saying same .
I have complete Theory that can solve Dark matter and the cause of big bang too

[slarzyer]

dah i thought we knew dark energy is all the forces of gravity we cant see yet ...aka dark ...cant be seen...energy ..a force ....in an infinite universe we see a tiny bubble (i mean we know we cant see everything yet) of it while the all the gravity of all the unseen is still there until u can see gravity we wont see dark energy ...we may only be able to detect the motion it causes i guess similar to how we found severl of the current known outeer planets

[internetprinting]

lol I discovered this and posted in comments a year ago

[shashikantdwivedi]

*Fantastic*
(Forget about Yellowstone blowing or Betelgeuse going to black-out.)

*Now Search about Neutron Star!🙄😳🤔*

*As Only 3200+/- Neutron Star are remaining.😕*
*According to Your Own Research!😉*

[michaelkahn]

There's No Dark Matter. There's No Dark Energy either.

Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime.

However, we also observe gravitational effects – curvature of spacetime – in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method.

An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed – it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime.

So, the question is now – why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass?

The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system – 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time.

The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”.

“Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies – regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter.

Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows.

As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as:

Expansion rate =

[--gmoney]

This is Neutonian, Conservation of Mass Says, No Matter the Form, Functionality, Or Singularity!.. Each should Affect/Warp the Dark Matter Map. It's only in the Side of Which Produces The Major/Minor Types of Formations...Does Gravity Change-or Stay Constant inside a Localized Field of Gravity Distortion!?! It should be Constant to the Constraints or Laws of the Field..if you can, Bend You Mind Over That!?!!!! So technically "Localized Quibts Can Happen"!!! Lol! If you consider Nintendo's Pass Through ;!

[aribamanjudevi]

Thank goodness.. A soulless individual sucks out soul from people near them.... Meaning they r fed with dark energies... Bingo.. ..

[jaymiller]

It's insensitive to say Black.

It's a Person, oops! I mean a Hole of Color.

[johntakolander]

But remembering that our Sun has a humongous magnetic field, and probably all other suns also, means that no dark energy is not needed. Besides: Isaac Newton wrote in his "Opticks" that gravity is created by particles residing in the empty parts of space! Read the book to the end!

[engizmo]

To me this makes a lot of sense. I've been saying for years that black holes are the source of dark energy. 😊