filmov
tv
Undeniable proof that Paul was a liar and false apostle in under 2 minutes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47717/477175d0e1aec3276a48f252f920a345469391dd" alt="preview_player"
Показать описание
Was the Paul a false apostle and a liar? Does the Bible hint that Paul was in fact a deceiver? It can be shown from the New Testament and Paul's own writings that he was indeed a false apostle. First, we know that the apostle Paul had witnessed to the Ephesians, of the 7 churches of Asia. We also know from 1Timothy 1:15 that he was deserted by ALL in Asia, which includes the Ephesians. And we read in the book of Revelation that Ephesians was praised for rejecting false apostles. So that would include Paul who witnessed to them!
Consider the following points.
Point 1. Paul writes to the church of Ephesus, located in Biblical Asia, and presents himself as an apostle of Jesus -- "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus. (Ephesians 1:1)"
Point 2. Paul later laments that he was deserted by all of Biblical Asia -- "You know that everyone in the province of Asia has deserted me (2Timothy 1:15)"
Point 3. The second and third chapters of the book of Revelation are addressed to 7 churches in Biblical Asia. While they are rebuked for many sins, they are not questioned for abandoning Paul.
Now, if Paul was a true apostle, and if the churches of Asia made a mistake by deserting Paul, then why were they not rebuked for rejecting Paul? Wouldn't they have received at least some rebuke for rejecting Paul?
Point 4. In Revelation 2, the church of Ephesus, to whom Paul claimed to be an apostle, is commended for testing and rejecting false apostles -- “I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false..."
So. If Paul presented himself as an apostle to Ephesus and was rejected. And if Ephesus is commended in Revelation for rejecting false apostles, what does that make Paul?
If we put one and one together, it makes Paul a false apostle. The Bible is telling us that Paul was a liar. Paul was a deceiver who claimed to be an apostle to spread his own gospel.
Thank you for watching. Please like, subscribe and share.
#Bible #NewTestament #Gospel
Consider the following points.
Point 1. Paul writes to the church of Ephesus, located in Biblical Asia, and presents himself as an apostle of Jesus -- "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus. (Ephesians 1:1)"
Point 2. Paul later laments that he was deserted by all of Biblical Asia -- "You know that everyone in the province of Asia has deserted me (2Timothy 1:15)"
Point 3. The second and third chapters of the book of Revelation are addressed to 7 churches in Biblical Asia. While they are rebuked for many sins, they are not questioned for abandoning Paul.
Now, if Paul was a true apostle, and if the churches of Asia made a mistake by deserting Paul, then why were they not rebuked for rejecting Paul? Wouldn't they have received at least some rebuke for rejecting Paul?
Point 4. In Revelation 2, the church of Ephesus, to whom Paul claimed to be an apostle, is commended for testing and rejecting false apostles -- “I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false..."
So. If Paul presented himself as an apostle to Ephesus and was rejected. And if Ephesus is commended in Revelation for rejecting false apostles, what does that make Paul?
If we put one and one together, it makes Paul a false apostle. The Bible is telling us that Paul was a liar. Paul was a deceiver who claimed to be an apostle to spread his own gospel.
Thank you for watching. Please like, subscribe and share.
#Bible #NewTestament #Gospel
Комментарии