Mediation models: direct, indirect and total effects (part 6 of 6)

preview_player
Показать описание
Professor Patrick Sturgis in the sixth (of six) part of the ‘Structural Equation Modelling (SEM): What it is and what it isn't’ online course.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

For those who are confused about how to test the significance of the indirect effect, please have a look at Baron and Kenny (1986), Mallinckrodt et al. (2006) and Diciccio and Romano (1988).

vivianezhou
Автор

How do you calculate an indirect effect of a model when the dependent variable has an non-recursive relation with the indirect latent variable?

ChrisS-bqpj
Автор

09:28 The professor said reject the null. If we reject the null, shouldn't we conclude that there IS an indirect effect? He said there isn't.

amznprime
Автор

Hi Professor, In my model, D, E, F (independent), mediating (B, C) and A (dependent). Total indirect effect from D to A is significant (p-0.018), but individual indirect effect from D>B>A is insignificant(p-0.069), and C>B>A is insignificant (p-0.154). How can I explain it?

Total and Individual indirect effects of E, F are significant

rathor
Автор

Great video! Very helpful and informative.

colinslabach
Автор

how do you test for the significance of the indriect effect??

tayyabmansoor
Автор

in mediation analysis, panel data have heteroscadicity issue. how to solve it???

dr.aniladevi
Автор

Great mediation video, I feel so relaxed that I'm going to sell all my weed, thank you, so much, let's be YouTube pals?

kevindurham