Batman: Return to Arkham Review

Our verdict on Batman's return to Arkham in the current-generation.

Watch more IGN Game Reviews here!

Batman: Arkham VR Review:

Batman: Return to Arkham Official Side-By-Side Trailer:

Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders Review:

10 Amazing Batman Fan Films To Watch:

------------------------------­----
Follow IGN for more!
------------------------------­----

#batman #returntoarkham #arkhamasylum #arkhamcity #arkhamknight

[JambopaulGamerInPJs]

Still buying it, I need an excuse to replay these games.

[thatcyanblur]

Arkham Asylum got a 9.3
Arkham City got a 9.5
This got a 7. Seems legit.

[iKnowReview]

Either you die a hero or live long a enough to see yourself become the villain...

[sirmeliodas]

Eh, it's the same as the other Arkham games, so it's fine.
I still enjoyed these games.

[dunbar]

Love the Arkham series to bits but what's honestly the point in remastering these if it's not at 60fps. So disappointing.

[lookathatdingo]

Wait, if it’s too bright why not just adjust brightness in the options menu?
Doesn’t that fix it?

[runargisli]

I really dont care if its 30 or 60 fps. just give me the game :0

[retardsrusjr]

Am I the only one who thinks it looks way better

[DylanLepore]

It's just sad, it doesn't seem they put any real effort in to these remasters anymore.

[osvaldomadrid]

I dont trust this lady's review. She usually doent know what she is talking about.

[hyperlegendultra]

I think the problems that people find in return to Arkham is in asylum. It looks better in some places and worse than others. The textures have been greatly improved. But, the models took a backseat with the exception of Gordon. I never understood why they changed Batman’s face in asylum but after playing I realized that he looks a lot like an the older version of the Batman from oigins. Which makes sense because origins is a prequel. I appreciate them for wanting to be consistent. You got to get used to it. I think they did a much better job with City

[Aamzy]

This is why people should never have gotten rid of their previous gen consoles. I still got my PS3 and got all Arkham games so don't need this.

[TheOnePistol]

So they expect us to repurchase a great game that kinda looks worse than before and runs on the same performance? Seems legit.

[CandarianGaming]

So instead of giving 60 fps they had to screw around with textures to make the performance worse. lol fail

[joshuanelson]

No _Arkham Origins_? That's disappointing. Say what you want about that game and Rocksteady not developing it, but I was honestly far more satisfied with _Arkham Origins_ than I was with _Arkham Knight_.

[JJ_]

I don't care! I just need to plat these games!

[jessechuff]

Just finished Asylum and it hasn’t aged that gracefully, but the graphical upgrades are very solid. I don’t understand the complaints very much here. They didn’t rebuild it from the ground up and Asylum was 7 years old when this collection was released. Seems a little too nitpicky to me.

[paviaan]

excellent review. We already know how good these games are overall, so performance with better hardware becomes the question. Often reviewers go on and on how good a game of 2009 is when reviewing it 5+ years later, while that's already known.

[Randomninja]

Bought it for $5 today. Totally worth it.
Played Asylum 4 times already and city twice. Don't care gonna play again.
When I need a RDR2 break that is.

[c.k.awesome]

I have played both versions of each game (Return to Arkham & traditional versions) I believe that both games have had better upgrades in Return to Arkham than in the traditional games. The issues in Return to Arkhams games is that the touch ups revealed the issues in the original versions, where they were hidden.