US Aerospace and the 'Legacy Program' Since WW2

Crash Retrieval in WW2 with The Vatican, US, and Private Industry.

Curt Jaimungal and Ross Coulthart discuss the existence of a secretive UAP legacy program allegedly dating back to WWII, involving the retrieval and reverse engineering of non-human technology. Coulthart mentions private aerospace companies like Lockheed Martin possibly possessing this technology, raising legal and ethical questions about government control versus private ownership. The discussion also explores the Vatican's involvement, the role of the Five Eyes alliance, and the broader implications of hidden advanced technologies on global security and defense strategies.

TOE'S TOP LINKS:
- Become a YouTube Member Here:

SPONSORS (please check them out to support TOE):

Other Links:

[FTributo]

Ross- While we agree that private industry should not have to divulge to Congress their IP, don't forget that the taxpayers have spent TRILLIONS of dollars in UAP black budget programs, funneled to the defense industry with ZERO accountability, no oversight, and no right of the public to know where their money is going. Former head of the GAO, Catherine Austin Fitz, states that at least 23 trillion dollars has gone into these programs, and is totally unaccounted for. Clearly, this is the 800 pound gorilla in the room, and something needs to change.

[tammyharris]

The problem is that they have illegally been given "We the People" tax money to fund these programs.
8 trillion dollars would fix many issues within our towns, cities and states.
If they want our money then we should be allowed to vote on what we give. Use public funding instead of tax money.

[branmikefrye]

Neither the government nor these companies own it. It was captured and studied and held back all using tax dollars. It belongs to the people.

[stephenwright]

Because Ross the billions the private industry spent developing the technology…was not theirs….it was mine and every other citizens money.

[dharmverma]

You are forgetting that these private companies have used taxpayers’ money.

[RufanaDenmark]

Withholding extremely advanced technology from the public should be illegal for several reasons: this technology can be used to solve humanity's greatest challenges, and the public has a right to know the answer to humanity's greatest question:: that we are not alone. Furthermore, Lockheed Martin has received public funds while also having a competitive advantage over their competitors.

[jbavar]

What you failed to realize is that the aerospace companies are not using their own money to research the materials. its the pentagon that is paying them to investigate materials and develop technology, ie its the American tax payer dollars that are funding these aerospace companies

[LeonPhythian]

Come on Ross over 23 trillion of tx payers money has been handed over to black budget programmes this money came from the tax paying people that's why they should hand it over.

[johnakin]

What money does Ross think that these aerospace companies were spending? Meaning, the money wasn't theirs it wasn't a government's it was the citizens of the United States that paid it out in taxes. It was never any aerospace's

[abakrem]

The private companies should be obligated to tell the public about the non human technology that they have found or been given.

[artscollab]

Mr.Coulthart grossly overestimates, repeatedly, the ability of corporations to operate ethically.

[FirstLast-vres]

It doesn't matter who "recovered it." Humanity has a right to KNOW if there is proof of non-human intelligence. Keeping it behind lock and key and not letting the scientific community examine it is not the correct way to handle such a situation. Just knowing that it exists is proof that interstellar travel is possible. That alone would open up funding into all sorts of fields of research.

[georgea.]

Completely disagree with Ross on this issue. Tax payer public funding got those vehicles into private industries hands. Too bad for them…

[hectorhaus]

Its not the USA government's technology to give. They represent the American people who are the real owners, not a corporation, or government.

[matthiasmajoris]

@24:15 I saw this same thing in 1994, Green bay WI!! I was layin down on my trampoline in my backyard looking up at the sky when a black triangle UFO blinked into existence. It traveling in a straight line, rotating clockwise And then blinked back out and disappeared! I alwaysnthought it seemed like it had a cloaking device that it for some reason turned off for a few seconds. Something I'll never forget!!

[BobFudge]

Don't agree with Ross at all. They were given the tech to back engineer it for military use but you can't forget this technology will be in the interests of the whole world. The clean energy systems are needed by the whole world for free clean energy to save our biosphere. 🤔

[bd]

Lockheed is spending billions of TAXPAYER dollars, not their own money. Not to mention that they were extended the privilege to work on said technology in the first place. That argument that they "own" anything after the fact is stupid and HOPEFULLY specifically written into any contractual agreements that were required before handing over this stuff.

[Robert-yr]

If the aerospace companies hold technology that could bring humanity into a much more evolved and peaceful existence, and they think they shouldn't have to disclose anything about it because its their intellectual property, that only speaks to the level of psychopathically greedy and myopic psychopathology in that industry..

[OBGynKenobi]

The thing is, the corporations are spending the money that the government is giving them.

[doctordistracto]

The problem with saying private companies have some IP right to keep it from the government is that this idea is just literally the opposite of how IP works. A patent is you asking the government to protect your invention in exchange for you disclosing to the government the exact step by step process for how to make it so that humanity doesn't lose the invention once you're gone. You can choose not to accept that deal and choose to just try to keep the creation process a secret, but then literally everyone in the world is absolutely 100% free not only to reverse engineer your product themselves but to go to market with it themselves, you have 0 protection from the government and spend billions on R&D to open yourself up to copycats and knock offs.

If you want protected from people taking your invention and selling it themselves, you disclose its existence and manufacture process. There's no other IP option, if you don't like that deal you're outside of the IP space.