Hamlet by Edward de Vere 174T (Sonnet Number Code 53)

Part 53 - The First and Second Quartos of Hamlet, and the First Folio copy, have clues that Edward de Vere was the writer.

[alexanderwaugh]

Another very interesting video - thank you. The V - ere on title page was brought up by the late Robert Brazil. If there is any association between Vere-Shakespeare and ‘King’ it surely pertains to his famous instance on sovereign mind - my mind to me a kingdom is etc. When he signed of ‘yours at an houres warning double V” he was of course signing off “yours 17 40”.

[theamazingmystico]

At 3:14, if you count from the first spoken line, the 17th line is "2. I haue seene nothing." The 4th word of the line is "nothing" (zero), so there is another 1740. The line could also indicate that Edward de Vere is a "nothing" or a "cipher" (one of the meanings of zero.). It is interesting that someone at the British Museum decided to place the stamp of the museum there with the crown. Also the collation mark B appears below the word "twice, " and B equals two, so there may be a 22 or Twice Eleven there.
In the second quarto, in the second line the words "stand and unfold yourself" are used. The word "unfold" was used at the time to mean "decipher" which hints that there is a hidden message revealing a name or identity, and you have identified that person.

[sorellman]

With the advent of Renaissance, gematria, or numerology was very popular among the most enlightened, the most educated members of the society. Leonardo da Vinci was familiar with the Kabbhalistic gematria,

[Tvarisch]

Bravo. N&L appear to be highlighted in LONDON, the L is suspicious and the N moreso, on sonnets, also the Thorpe T is the same typeface as the opening T on the 2nd folio. Dunno if it's relevant but there's something going on with LONDON imo. The Thorpe T looks like a typeface change but I may easily be wrong

[Tvarisch]

These TTTT acrostics can be evaluated. They will be unique I believe, or at the least extremely rare. You've got bags of stuff here we can measure I think.
Well done again. Two V is just so blatant isn't it . Read if thou canst.

[bluebellwood]

Once again John my brain has been flexed. I appreciate your time and effort. I tried through numbers to somehow come up with an answer through the words Denmarke and Hamlet to no availe. Trying to figure out the prince part.

[patricktilton]

The "V-" at the end of the 2nd of the 3 lines in the Q1 title page's small paragraph is placed above the word "where" at the end of the 3rd of 3 lines. If we ignore the "wh" and just focus on the "ere" then we get those 2nd and 3rd of 3 lines ending in "V-" and "ere" = "Vere" -- which might be the reason that "Universities" was spelled with a capital 'V' rather than with a capital 'U'. I'm sure I'm not the first Oxfordian to notice this!

[zantlozantlom]

I appreciate your work. I have done some decrypting using the methods Sir Francis Bacon outlines in his writings. Given that he claims that he used encryption methods, why would one not look for them. He used several different types of alphabets, not just Simple Cipher. His one cipher technique is the Binary Code used in computers. A coded example- "At London." If you count the letter "o" as 2 zeros, you get 61 (your favorite, Simple Chipher) which is "King" (Simple Cipher.) But, you can take that further by using Short Cipher, where it is 22 which is "Roi, " for French King and also "Stuart, not to mention twice eleven. Bacon was the legitimate son of Francis II of France and Mary Queen of Scots (a Stuart.)

[mudfloodaustraliaandrebuil]

Morning, Is there any reference to "300" years . Or just 300? In any of the codes?

[mrb]

There are certainly some fascinating discrepancies, seen from our own age, between Shakespeare the writer and Shakespeare the man.

But I find the endless ingenuity of Oxfordian or Baconian 'clue' finders to be an exercise in apophenia, our natural tendency to find patterns and meaning in unrelated information.

When it comes to the text, two absolute dead ends, it seems to me, are numerology, the use of numbers to detect hidden meanings, and anagram seeking, because they can both be used to support any predetermined conclusion. I know I could 'prove' Shakespeare was a time traveller from 1980's Bolton, with a love of fried chicken if I tried hard enough. But where would be the fun in that?

Sorry, I just don't buy it guys.