Instead of Large Battle, Why Not Many Skirmishes? - War Thunder

preview_player
Показать описание
Get 3% Off on the War Thunder Store + DECAL :

Get 3% Off on the Enlisted Store :

Support my work on Patreon :

Support my work on SubscribeStar :

Check out the Merch Store :

Update 2.37.0.53 :

I am part of the War Thunder and Enlisted Content Partnership Program :

All My Social Media Links :

We have partnered with Humble Bundle :

We have partnered with Fanatical :

Send your Replays or Questions here :

Music used from:

System Specs : Intel Core i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz, 32GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz, EVGA 3070TI FTW3

Hope you enjoy the video and have an amazing day :)

#gaming #news #warthunder
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I personally would love to see a pve mode where its your team vs infantry, enemy tank ai, ai planes, bunkers, anti tank guns and other assorted enemies, they could call it Breakthrough, i think it would be quite fun

alucardgd
Автор

Microchanges like that would require manpower to monitor which cost money. Companies don't like to experiment.

TheKythia
Автор

5.7 - 7.7 BR is CAS zone. Seriously, every damn match ends with half of teams going into planes and no-one stays at ground to play objectives - even if you tried, you would die to Me-262 or equivalent to that. This plane has no problem penning M26...

I would want 1 change to make BR matchmaking be in +/- 0.7 and not 1.0 like it's now. It might not look like a big change, but it is. At least for GRB brackets. Would make it more balanced I think.

info
Автор

The Pbv could be invincible and it would still be bad because it regularly takes 2 shots to kill an enemy and you only get 7 missiles.

Muffalopadus
Автор

I like the last suggestion of limited time deals for tt vehicles as well.

MaticTheProto
Автор

I would like a rush game mode like battlefield where one team attacks and another defend and you progress on a big map.
Or another battlefield concept where you break up the big maps into smaller matches where the winner decides on which side of the map the spawns and objectives are moving until you reach a big objective to fight over.

nicolaspeigne
Автор

the ATGMs fell under the radar because no matter how safe you are when firing, if you can not hit or damage targets it wonˋt matter.
might as well hide inside a house and never fire, same effectiveness and impact as most ATGMs in the game.
The TOW 2B is useless because in 90% of cases it deals no or almost no damage, spading the Wisel 1A2 was pure pain and I went back to the TOW 2A which, while still falling out of the launcher for no reason but at least in case of a hit I would deal damage to the enemy and might actuall kill it.

AlphaHorst
Автор

Rp and sl discounts would be a great idea for naval and some unplayable vehicles

mohammadsoleman
Автор

The ground vehicles in simulator, for instance, don't spawn if you're past 22, 000 ft distance And they can start shooting at you and around 9000 feet so you have 8, 000 ft of wiggle broom to try to see them line up and attack before you are dead.

clicktresni
Автор

Early Cold War Jets and hold off on the Modern stuff since the game mode does not work with those right now plz and thanks.

AirsoftFaction
Автор

So is there not going to be a summer event? They said the new events would be back to back, but its been a while. I'd prefer a big summer event with multiple vehicles. But it doesn't look good since we havent heard anything about it.

stevensmileyprod
Автор

wait a second, so there are diff mdels for planes arcade and in real? and potentially in sim?
same for other vehicles and missiles?
like WHY THE ACTUAL F they have different?
seriously, arcade supposed to be arcade, fun, quick games and nowadays it's more realistic than RB itself wtf...
just add a modifier that makes missiles more agile in arcade to the planes more likely to shot down.
also manymanymany ww2/cold war/modern AA with their guns missing the proxy fuse shells which in turns ppl using them as anti-tank or not at all as they are bad as AA and bad as anti tank too.

Dosahka
Автор

Is it me or does Americas heavy tank lineup need another look cause at 7.7 America has 2 heavys ones just purely better than the other

MTF-EPSILON---NULL
Автор

Look look look. They always want you to feel like there's something else in the game that they could work towards or that they need to play because it's the new met a and that takes weeks and weeks or takes money.

clicktresni
Автор

interesting idea..

during this video i thought about a new pseudo-gamemode/balance change...

so to not disrupt the main game for experimentation its going to be entirely seperate.

Im thinking of "Dynamic BRs".

It will work something like this:

At the start when its implemented, tanks will have the same BR as their RB counterparts, but ever since the start these BRs will dynamically change fluidly, lets say updated every 24 h, and battles will be matched +-1BR like now, and it will take BRs at the time of entering battle.

So, how will these BRs of all vehicles dynamically change? Each of those 24 hours, it will calculate the BR of each vehicle to a thousandth (ie. BR 3.455), based on however its changed (i.e 1: based on winrate set to50%, so if the winrate of that vehicle is lets say 70%, it will go up by like 0.5, if its 60% it will go up by like 0.2 if its 51% it will go up by 0.001, and same if its below 50%, so like 30% WR will make its BR 0.5 lower etc., or 2: based on kills per spawn with that vehicle, so they could make the center point 1 kill so if the average is higher/lower it could adjust accordingly.)

This would equalize the playing field by a lot, and you will never have the same tank at the same br almost never. and possible matchups will be a lot different too because for exaple you play tank with 7.895 BR and you wont be able to match with a tank with 8.901 BR because the difference is over 1. And since it changes daily, your tank could go slightly up and the other tank slighlty down, allowing you to see that tank, changing the performance of both since they will influence the battle differently... this could be interesting..

tell me what you think. this could be either disasterous idea or a genius idea, with no in between. I would like some critics on this idea.

petrkdn
Автор

They still haven't fixed a bug where AGMs and other air to ground ordinance is completely invincible or invisible for no reason

Danknic
Автор

TEC, Gaijin only needs to make one micro-change to make everything perfect:

They simply need to add a tank, for me only to use, that is faster than any other vehicle in the game, can climb to prrfect sniper spots no matter the degree of incline, has armor that cannot be penetrated by any weapon & vannot be overpressured and is equipped with a cannon that can unfailingly penetrate the armor of all opposition regardless of angle.

That one micro-change would make the game perfect, ....for me. 😜

pauld
join shbcf.ru