Advocate J Sai Deepak explains complexities of SC’s verdict on same-sex marriage issue

Advocate J Sai Deepak, representing respondent Bharatiya Stree Shakti while speaking over the Supreme Court’s verdict on same-sex marriage explained the judgment’s complexities and preferable steps the Government will adopt to address the issue without going for legislative amendments of special marriage act.
A five-judge SC bench in a 3:2 majority verdict ruled that for LGBTQIA+ couples there is no unqualified right to marriage. The court, however, said that the judgement will not preclude the right of Queer persons to enter into relationships. The apex court also said that the challenge to the Special Marriage Act (SMA) on the ground of under-classification is not made out.
He said, “"I think the other side may prefer a review or a reference on certain legal questions, I am not sure of it though. I think the Government may want to look at what kind of operational issues it can address without going for legislative amendments of the SMA (Special Marriage Act) because ultimately on the question of legislative amendments of SMA because it involves the question of revisiting the institution of marriage...The in-between measure could be that it recognises certain civil unions without giving it the same status as marriage and also has a different regime if they wish to adopt. Child Health experts will have to be considered. I think the Government as well as the Parliament may perhaps constitute a committee..."

#JSaiDeepak #same-sexmarriage #LGBTQ

--------------------------------------
ANI is South Asia's leading Multimedia News Agency providing content for every information platform, including TV, Internet, broadband, newspapers, and mobiles.
Subscribe now! Enjoy and stay connected with us!!
☛ Copyrights © All Rights Reserved ANI Media Pvt Ltd.

[TheGoodGuy]

My man bent the woke Supreme Court with his Logical Arguments. He is the real G. O. A. T

[sunintheeast]

My favourite advocate lawyer he’s one man just grt his vision n thought process is amazing n to thr point 🎉🫶👏

[citizengaming]

Meanwhile andhnamazi thinks Dhruv Rathee is padha likha 🤣🤣🤣

[RockySanz]

A marriage is a union of a man(male) and a woman(female). I'm not against Homosexuals but they shouldn't demand marriage ffs

[R]

In advocate fraternity no one can match up the intelligence ability of J sai Deepak bcz while arguing on this topic in SC nobady was able to counter his argument.

[oncesaidlegal]

I read some comments stating that there millions of children who are waiting to be adopted, Okay, so? There are Millions of Poor in this country too, can you give them a few lakhs each and will that solve the problem ? No, of course not, but it will definitely bring chaos in the economy. Similarly, you cant just hand over the children to everyone who wants them, it might not solve the issue of orphancy in India, but it will definitely bring social disorder if it goes the other way around.

[Ronifromearth]

Big win ❤❤❤ no wikesim in cultural land of BHARAT

[phaninadella]

The first person who came to my mind post watching the verdict was J. Sai Deepak 🔥

[iarikm]

Right decision from judiciary thanks 🙏👍

[Shomishtha]

Kudos to tbis brave man for saving our culture

[varuntomar]

Government will never allow it 😂😂😂, they were the only one who were fighting in the court against these laws

[d_dpo]

There was a recent case in America where 2 gay guys who were living together had adopted 2 boys. Later it got revealed that they were raping those boys and forcing them to do sexual acts with their other gay friends and putting up those videos on select sites for money. Cji might think innocently that all homosexual couples are so pious and great that they'll do the right things for the children they adopt, but he needs to read more about crimes committed against those adopted children. And if live in heterosexual couples are also allowed to adopt, what happens when they casually break up? This is not a pet dog that they can take in whenever they feel and then leave when there is a break up. If they can't even commit to a relationship and marry, what's the guarantee that they can commit to something even greater like parenthood? A lot of things need to be considered instead of just blindly aping the west thinking it to be great. A certain section of conservative America has started saying maybe eroding of their family values with couples having children outside wedlock, etc has resulted in a lot of social issues. This is one is the main platforms of the republican party in fact. Questions must be invited from all stakeholders of society before making laws involving children.

[cnk]

Psychologists are damn important before making this decision.

[steelfeathersteelfeather]

Today what SC did, according to me is just a drama .

If the same thing which related to Hindu practices they would eagerly enter by leaving 70k pending cases ….
It’s a game & SC doesn’t want to have weight on them when it comes to such matters, again when it comes to Hindu issues they will for sure & we are good secular people accept what they say…

[vigneshsubramanian]

Idt JSD hates homosexuals but rather he is against legalizing the marriage moreso because of their political leanings which is bad for Bharat. In the end it is about Bharats interests.

[mathspowerinhand]

The decision is still very unorganised...there are many upcoming issues that's may born as a result of this judgement within the society in which they'll live...for ex in reference to the adoption by nonhetrosexuals...

[nancygardensable]

He is well on his way to be one among the panel of ASGs for the govt and may be with seniority and competence even SG and AG.😊

[spookyargument]

I think slowly but surely Judiciary will render legislature redundant.

[Muktijit]

He's a history teacher
He's a expert in Santani rituals
He's a great philosopher
He's a expert lawyer
He's a great podcaster
He's a genius in all

Basically he's Johnny sins of India

[santoshdevanallikar]

Good analysis and articulation of judgement