How Nations Respond - COVID-19 Global Impacts Webinar

preview_player
Показать описание
Responses to the novel coronavirus and the proliferation of COVID-19 cases have varied by country and regime type. Guided by national leaders with dramatically different styles, we take a look across nations and see how Japan, India and other Asian countries outside of China have rolled out their national strategies for containing the pandemic; and take a closer look at who is considered among the best performers. [Show ID: 35865]

UCTV is the broadcast and online media platform of the University of California, featuring programming from its ten campuses, three national labs and affiliated research institutions. UCTV explores a broad spectrum of subjects for a general audience, including science, health and medicine, public affairs, humanities, arts and music, business, education, and agriculture. Launched in January 2000, UCTV embraces the core missions of the University of California -- teaching, research, and public service – by providing quality, in-depth television far beyond the campus borders to inquisitive viewers around the world.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Flattening of the curve refers to cases per day, not total cases. The cases per day is the slope of plots shown. A logarithmic plot of cases per day is more useful as it is easier to identify the peak infection rate as well as the impact of social distancing and other policies.

logaandm
Автор

Your Japan report was very enlightening. Thanks!

eship
Автор

One speaker says 'we have not seen a national lockdown' anywhere other than India. I believe South Africa started its national lock down on about the same day as India.

TimothyWhiteheadzm
Автор

Time Lapse "Total Cases" of the COVID-19 for Malaysia. One of earliest in the world.

This is Malaysia's unseen incredible COVID-19 story with high recovery rate and low fatality rate.

26/1/2020 - 🇲🇾 4th highest in the world
10/2/2020 - 🇲🇾 5th highest in the world
20/2/2020 - 🇲🇾 5th highest in the world
26/2/2020 - 🇲🇾 10th highest in the world
01/3/2020 - 🇲🇾 14th highest in the world
10/3/2020 - 🇲🇾 18th highest in the world
20/3/2020 - 🇲🇾 19th highest in the world
27/3/2020 - 🇲🇾 22nd highest in the world
01/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 25th highest in the world
05/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 30th highest in the world
10/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 34th highest in the world
11/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 35th highest in the world
13/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 37th highest in the world
15/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 39th highest in the world
17/4/2020 - 🇲🇾 40th highest in the world
01/5/2020 - 🇲🇾 49th highest in the world
10/5/2020 - 🇲🇾 51th highest in the world
13/5/2020 - 🇲🇾 51th highest in the world

srikandisuryavarman
Автор

The speakers are making rather wild conclusions based on numbers they clearly don't understand. You should get some mathematicians in the discussion next time.
Also one speaker says that Singapore has 'got things wrong' based on the total number of confirmed cases. He should have looked at the deaths (11 as of this writing). Most countries would love to be that 'wrong' right now.

TimothyWhiteheadzm