11 Tokyo Firebombing claims The History Channel got wrong, some really wrong

preview_player
Показать описание
The history channel claims they are “The most trustworthy source of information entertainment in media.” The video will check the claims made by the channel’s website, ““This day in history” for the date of March 9. On March 9th 1945, 21st bomber command firebombed Tokyo. The history channel‘s article describing this bombing was written and edited by 4 employees. In the course of the review, 11 of the claims will be refuted with evidence and justification provided.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Odd, you'd think a channel that studies Bigfoot and aliens would be the 'go to' truth source. Good work!

jackpinesavage
Автор

Sad, there used to be a time when Discovery, History, and Science channels were legit, long ago. This is exactly why I keep recommending this channel to friends who are interested in history.

luvr
Автор

Rigorous historical research at its finest. That's why I love this channel.

Compulsive_LARPer
Автор

Thank you. An excellent and necessary critique. The History Channel is more political history than real history. You are appreciated, my friend. Thanks again!

brucermarino
Автор

Kick 'em right in the facts! Keep doing what you're doing.

bruceday
Автор

Awesome job.
The HISTORY channel WAS good at one time, before they had to become more "marketing friendly".

jupiterjunk
Автор

You're providing a stellar example for other historians to handle issues like this.

mattwilliams
Автор

Thank you, thank you, thank you for posting this. Even books these days are equally poorly edited and fact checked.

memonk
Автор

The fact check alert buzzer goes off as soon as they say "The History Channel", honestly.

djackmanson
Автор

I usually feel the need to take everything I hear on YouTube with a grain of salt, but this channel is an exception. The channel doesn't just cite their source, but it will make a point to integrate the primary sources into the video itself and highlight where exactly the data is coming from. Outstanding job and unfortunate that it takes this much effort to get the truth out there.

nyssfairchild
Автор

We love and respect this wonderfully detailed fact checking effort. The closer we look at ‘facts’, the more we’re reminded that we live in the disinformation age.

TimNelson
Автор

Stellar analysis. I have to say, as a research professional in another field, not only is your work spot on in methodology, it’s absolutely the nature of scholarship in general. It’s the job of a research scholar to go behind what previous researchers and so-called authorities have done and clean it up.

David-icby
Автор

It's important to set out the actual facts of these tremendously important events and leave us to draw our own conclusions. Thank you.

steveball
Автор

Kudos, you consistently provide receipts. Something the “History” channel can’t seem to be bothered with.

stevenhundley
Автор

I'd expect The History Channel to mention ancient aliens.

psikogeek
Автор

It has been many years since the History Channel cared about any historical accuracy, especially about WW2 battles, personalities, or equipment. They are strictly an "entertainment" channel, more interested in getting ratings with weird and spurious UFO and hidden treasure shows. They got out of the history game because there was so little money in it.

Perfusionist
Автор

500 feet not feasible for a number of reasons - like flying into something solid? The dambusters raid was flown at that height but that was in bright moonlight.

philiphumphrey
Автор

Thank you for calling them out on their shoddy facts.

peewee
Автор

History Channel "Trustworthy": something that may have been true in the 1990s when they first started, but not since they went the route of "Ancient Aliens".

It would seem that they may have been confused by some of the facts concerning the Atomic Missions, and Col. Tibbetts and others felt the removal of all armament except the tailguns would aid aircraft performance. I don't know this, but I assume they also removed the gunner's stations and all of the high-tech sighting and coordinated firing equipment as well.

I suppose we should be happy they mentioned the raids and I hope didn't get judgmental about them.

B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
Автор

I really enjoy these videos. You document all the information presented. Thanks. 😊

jayshaw