BREAKING: Juror in Trump trial may have broken confidentiality | LiveNOW from FOX

preview_player
Показать описание
The judge overseeing the hush money trial flagged a Facebook post seeming to imply that a juror revealed deliberations, breaking confidentiality. Justice Juan Merchan informed prosecutors and Trump's attorneys that a user published on the New York court system's Facebook, claiming their cousin was a juror, and gave away the verdict.

Legal analyst Jeremy Rosenthal joins LiveNOW from FOX.

Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I say this, investigate all of the jurors and see what's lying in their Bank accounts..

redhotmsu
Автор

Judge Merchan needs to be held accountable also after he gave the jury instructions "toward a guilty verdict".

NoDemsAllowed
Автор

Praying and hoping the TRUTH wins over the fake trial! 🙏🙏🙏

mariteri
Автор

Alina Habba has been VINDICATED! She said plain and clear, no GOOD judge would EVER let the jurors go home for the weekend!

jryer
Автор

Rigging ain't hard, but it's hard to keep people quiet...

mrpoolplayer
Автор

Either way, jurors are NOT supposed to talk about the case or verdict to ANYONE PERIOD, before the verdict is read in the court!!

lisaarchuleta
Автор

Don't need a cousin to anticipate a conviction in a blue state in a blue court with deep blue judge and a even bluer jury.

herensugue
Автор

Just another ploy to tie him up again in a court room! CHARGES SHOULD BE DROPPED, PERIOD!

JoanCassLucas
Автор

What about Sunny (from the View) stated several days prior to the jury going into deliberations. Said, someone in Braggs office leaked the verdict...
Nothing was done about that....

JoeyRoberts-iw
Автор

the whole thing should be thrown out of court

LilMissSmartyPants.
Автор

Bragg never named the crime that elevated a misdemeanor at best charge. He didn't name it because it didn't happen. The judge instructed the jurors that it was not important that they never heard the details of a crime that made it a felony charge. It was never brought out. Merchan's instructions said it was enough to know that the misdemeanor was a cover for the more serious felony scenario. In other words, it's IMPLIED that it must have been a cover for some unnamed crime. Misconduct by the judge, misconduct on the part of every single juror for getting in line like ducks crossing the street.

Theywaswrong
Автор

Jurors were told what to vote on and feared the same would happen to them. They create a case against an innocent man all the time.

SusanKassandra
Автор

Check the jury bank accounts and spending habit or big putchases after the Trial.

seansvns
Автор

The jury was not sequestered by design so friends and family could influence them. Merchant did a terribly biased job. At one point he referred to the prosecution as we.

michaelangelo
Автор

Those jurors don't even want to show their faces I wonder why

william
Автор

Jurors are NOT suppose to discuss a case they are on …at ALL…‼️‼️

deefaye
Автор

Think jurors bowed to peer pressure induced by the judge rather than finding evidence to base their decision.

andy
Автор

When does Stormys breach of contract trial start ?

onthelake
Автор

Jurors knew they were going to convict before the trial ended? Shocker 😂

ddavidone
Автор

It's felony malfeasance when a DA and judge collectively use their positions of authority to elevate a non crime into a felony for the purpose of doing harm to another person, like Bragg and judge Merchan did with Trump. Not only should both men be disbarred for their actions, but charged accordingly as well.

jamesparker