CNA | Talking Point | E19: Singapore education reforms - What do parents, students feel about it?

preview_player
Показать описание
This week, in a special episode of Talking Point, a group of parents and students get real about the slew of changes to Singapore's education system. Unknown to them, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung is there to address their feedback.

About the show: Talking Point investigates a current issue or event, offering different perspectives to local stories and revealing how it all affects you.

Follow us:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Instead of just focusing on “exam or not exam” to reduce the need for tuition, What we need is smaller class size so that Teachers are able to spend enough time to not just teach but also coach each student so that no one will be left behind. Our Teachers today don’t have sufficient time to truly bond with their students and truly treat them as individuals instead of a “class”.

lindalim
Автор

The minister came out too early. It's hard to have a candid discussion with him around.

ybbolb
Автор

This discussion is so open and it is so amazing! CNA needs to do this open discussion more often!

AndricChia
Автор

Instead of focusing on the topic they are talking about, I should admire how smart the parents are. They able to express their opinion effectively without a meaningful barrier.

afiframadhan
Автор

We should be so grateful minister ong has the right passion and attitude toward education

yeezhihao
Автор

Psle is nthing when u finish it, there r many more exams after that

pspsps
Автор

His daughter asked for tuition because she couldn't keep up. The minister needs to ask why so many students can't keep up in school that they or their parents feel that tuition is necessary.

mamemo
Автор

Another flaw in our education system is that we create the illusion that everyone in Singapore is born “perfect” since we don’t allow diversity in terms of special needs and those with disabilities to integrate or even “exist” in all schools. To drive“efficiency”, it is at the expense of the dignity of the less fortunate. The result is that many students in regular schools (99%) are awkward and don’t even know how to interact or help one another when they are out in the real world where it is not all “perfect”. By segregation, we are not including all and ensuring everyone has the right to feel they belong as an equal in our society, we are not allowing our kids to truly embrace and practice Diversity & Inclusion. Rather, we led some into expecting “Straight As” is the norm, anyone scoring less is a loser, failing is unacceptable and if you are not perfect, you are unforgivable and has no right to exist.

lindalim
Автор

This minister got 1st class honor at LSE. I am so jealous of him.

angelamagnus
Автор

We need our government to be pragmatic in supporting the biz yet stay focus on Singaporean’s future first. From a HR professional perspective, We need to immediately allow more Singaporeans not just TOP students to study computer analytics/courses and be equipped with the hot skills that are in demand globally if we want to close the skill-job GAP we are facing today and Ensure our people continue to be relevant and employable in the future. There are too many vacancies yet we don’t offer more such courses and provide more such Earn as you learn job opportunities to train and close the skill GAP. In fact, computing should be a compulsory subject from primary school.

lindalim
Автор

diana too extra. just get to the point. issue here is we live in a competitive, capitalistic, globalised world where the best survive. the reduction of stress will not help kids become tougher to compete in the global marketplace in the long run. the only way to sell this is that reducing exams in fact IMPROVES the child's education. theres a few ways to argue this. 1 way was mentioned: less exams = more time for teachers to teach better = smarter kids. another way is less exams = less implicit emphasis BY THE SYSTEM in exams (not necessarily by parents, but it is hoped that the govt taking the lead/setting an example of where their values/principles lie will change parents' minds in the long run) = more room to fail = more creative students = more entrepreneurs/or citizens who are able to adapt in a quickly changing global market where creativity is increasingly valued vs. rote-learning. another way maybe that less exams = more time to do other stuff = more creativity/love for learning etc., with the same outcome of more creative, competitive citizens who are better equipped to compete in the global marketplace.

thegoonist
Автор

Please return “ good citizenship” to our curriculum. The one where we learn about Singaporeans of every race language and religion. Understanding leads to acceptance and we stand united as SINGAPOREANS.
It’s so scary to see what is happening around us with the radicalisation of many youths in the region.
We need to teach them to fact check as well as respect for our country our family unit and our fragile peace.

ajisenramen
Автор

I also believe we need to move away from O and A levels towards IB curriculum for all the academic and more apprenticeship for all students starting from Secondary to prepare them to be more worldly and employable not only bookish and sheltered.

lindalim
Автор

Its scary how some countrys around asia has kids basically in class for 15 hrs a day.
the mind must be handicapped from creative thinking out side the box.

dadsonworldwide
Автор

Wow...sooo constructive and open frank session...our Ministers are top class...God bless...Amen

paullim
Автор

as a teaacher from india, this kind of discussion should go in our country also. but our politicians are not on par with these fellows

kvrscience
Автор

Honestly teachers r gonna hv the hardest time

pspsps
Автор

17:22 Host interrupts the Education Minister...

senng
Автор

It's unfortunate, no one focus on learning and applications. What are the exams for computer games, sports, music, ....? There are music performance, sports competition, art exhibitions, ... why students stop studying after exam? They are not interested in learning. They are only studying to do well in exam.

jimw
Автор

They missed out an important factor: school principal

Happy-vfd