Deriving the Law of Cosines With Geometric Algebra

preview_player
Показать описание
In this short, I show a quick derivation of the law of cosines using geometric algebra.

I thought I would try YouTube shorts out, so I'm planning on making one a week. This only took me several hours to make, so it shouldn't interfere with my main videos too much. Look forward to seeing more of these in the future!

Patreon Supporters:
Christoph Kovacs
David Johnston
Jason Killian
LoganMP
p11
Richard Penner
Rosario
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Gonna be honest, this was pretty sick.
I wonder whether the cosine rule for quadrilaterals can also be derived this way.

caspermadlener
Автор

That's actually insanely cool. I wonder for which other polygons you get cool expressions.

evandrofilipe
Автор

I have been doing this without knowing it's geometric algebra.

sounakroy
Автор

A connection between the fundamental theorem calculus, sequences and trigonometry. This should be the general derivation of the law of cosines.

danielfrt
Автор

Some of these comments are interesting. Fun stuff!

curiousaboutscience
Автор

Isn't a.b = ab cos(theta) normally derived from the properties of the dot product using the law of cosines? This seems like a circular argument.

artkalbphd
Автор

I'm just here for the pretty colors and squiggly lines

ayokay
Автор

I hate schools and colleges for not showing us such stuff

TheDigiWorld
Автор

Holy fuck that’s so fucking smart oh my god

anuraagkumar
Автор

Wow that’s really helpful in my everyday life

GarnetGoldGunner
Автор

What is meant with the "square of a vector"? Or should it be the absolute value?

JonasLampert-sw
Автор

given n vectors forming a loop in n dimension euclidean space:
0 = Si (Ai^2) + 2(Sij (Ai.Aj))
Ai : one of the vectors
Si : the sum of the terms

e.g. n = 4
0 = a + b + c + d
squared, gives
0 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2[a.b + a.c + a.d + b.c + b.d + c.d]
cool

fredeisele
Автор

huh I am in class 9 I learnt this but this looks harder that rocket science

I_S_H_A_A_N
Автор

While this is interesting, it is overly complicated. You can get the exact same result by doing the same process with the dot product instead of the geometric product. Nonetheless, I am sure the geometric product will work better in similar scenarios.

xy
Автор

Took me a moment to figure out what was happening when you skipped the step where the bivectors cancel. But I guess it makes sense to ignore them since they aren't relevant to the problem.

Dayanto
Автор

Why didn't you say it is al kashi theorem if it were Pythagoras theorem you would be shouting

Abc-osvm
Автор

Geometric Algebra is the absolute shit

joefuentes