Watergate | 5 Minute Video

preview_player
Показать описание
If you ask most people to explain what Watergate was all about, they might say that it was about a bungled break-in that brought down a president. That’s true, but the break-in is the least significant part of the scandal. What else should you know? Radio host and columnist Hugh Hewitt has the real story.

FOLLOW PragerU!

SHOP!

Script:

The most famous political scandal in American history is, of course, Watergate. It’s so famous that even now, 50 years after it happened, almost every scandal of any kind comes with an obligatory “gate” after it.

If you ask most people to explain what Watergate was all about, they draw a blank. If they know a bit of history, or perhaps they lived through it, they might say something like this: “It was about a bungled break-in that brought down a president.” That’s true. But the break-in is the least significant part of the story.

Watergate was, first and foremost, a political war between the president, Richard Nixon, and the media, which in those pre-cable days meant ABC, CBS, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post. The media’s aim, in the words of British historian Paul Johnson, “was to use publicity to reverse the electoral verdict of 1972.”

Why? What did the media have against Nixon? That’s a complex question, but we can essentially boil it down to three things: 1. He was despised by the East Coast liberal elite, of which the Washington press corps was a key component. 2. He was a staunch anti-communist. The media considered the communist threat to be overblown. 3. He refused to abandon South Vietnam. Nixon insisted on “a peace with honor.” The media was entirely “anti-war.”

Even though Nixon spent most of his adult life in New York and Washington, he never fit in. Born in a small town in California, there were no Ivy League degrees on his resume. To make matters worse, while not being part of McCarthyism, he made his reputation aggressively exposing Alger Hiss, a communist in the U.S. State Department in the late 1940s. After serving as vice president under Dwight Eisenhower for eight years, he ran against and nearly defeated John F. Kennedy, the paragon of East Coast elitism in 1960.

Then, eight years later, and much to the media’s dismay, Nixon mounted an improbable political comeback to win that year’s presidential election. And then, as if rubbing the media’s nose in it, he won again in a 49-state landslide in 1972.

Something had to be done. Ironically, Nixon’s own people provided the opportunity the media had been waiting for. On June 17, 1972, five men associated with the Nixon re-election campaign broke into the offices of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate office building in Washington, D.C. Presumably, they intended to gather information about the Democrats’ campaign strategy. Whatever their purpose, it was a painfully dumb plan that turned catastrophic when the burglars were caught in the act and arrested by D.C. police.

Nixon found out about it—like everyone else—in the morning papers. Initially, he didn’t think it was a big deal. “I had been in politics too long,” he later wrote, “and had seen everything from dirty tricks to vote fraud. I could not muster much moral outrage over a political bugging.”

Today, most would conclude that if he had simply acknowledged his campaign’s responsibility—“owned it,” as we say, fired those responsible, and apologized, the whole sorry mess would have been rendered the minor incident it was. But, as historian Evan Thomas noted, Nixon “wasn’t paying attention and when he was confronted with the problems below deck, he didn’t really engage… by the time he did, it was too late.”

So the scandal grew beyond his control. Three men made sure of that: a publicity-seeking judge, a revenge-seeking FBI official, and a partisan special prosecutor.

The judge was John Sirica. Suspecting a vast conspiracy, Sirica threatened the burglars with lifetime prison sentences if they didn’t rat out the people who authorized the crime. The media loved Sirica. For a time, he was the most famous jurist in the country.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I like how Democrats raised hell about Watergate, but none of them had any problems when LBJ tapped Barry Goldwater's headquarters and plane in 1964.

satvikdash
Автор

All i know, Forrest Gump helped set the stage for the scandal to be discovered.

SeroCloud
Автор

A man is not finished when he's defeated; he's finished when he quits. - Richard Nixon

budicaesar
Автор

This sounds oddly familiar to what happened to Trump. I'm 56 years old. I was a boy at that time. And I never took the time to learn the whole story. Thank you!

-Ordinary-Average-Guy
Автор

Remember when Trump was in office and the media would sensationalize the smallest things by saying that it could be worst than Watergate? Good times.

MagicLink
Автор

Interesting fact, it’s actually because of Watergate that all documents and records from every administration are classified as public record and it is therefore mandatory for them to be included in all presidential libraries for public display.
Nixon tried and failed to prevent the Watergate tapes and other files from being put on display in his own library.

GlamorousTitanic
Автор

Okay are we not gonna talk about the fact that this FBI dude’s codename is “deep throat?”

coopahtroopah
Автор

"History will point out some of the things I did wrong and some of the things I did right" George H.W. Bush

xavierbrown
Автор

What Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and the whole Crossfire Hurricane thing was just as bad if not worse than this. Especially considering that they lied to the FISA court. The fact that not one indictment has come from this is sickening.

Rockhound
Автор

Concise and informative. As a young boy, I remember this happening. Many adults said "many politicians did similar things, Nixon just got caught. "

jlglover
Автор

Nixons people were just doing what LBJs did to them in 1964 lol.

sloopfan
Автор

I will say though.... media back then wasn't quite as horrific as it is today. Journalists jobs were dependent on whether they could break a story, and if it was truthful. Nowadays you can say literally anything with no recourse

JtheInsane
Автор

Wow This is the clearest I've heard it explained from elementary to college. Thank you.

god
Автор

And then, a few years later, Nixon agreed to be interviewed by David Frost. On May 4th, 1977, the first part of the interviews were broadcast on national television. Over 45 million people tuned in to watch. It remains the largest TV audience of a political interview in history. Star Wars was released the same day

BenHopkins
Автор

It's actually pretty amazing how someone can watch this video, see how the speaker is clearly pushing a narrative and coloring events with his opinions, and still think that this video is giving an objective retelling of events.

ppppp
Автор

I remember the Watergate hearings well, even though as a mere teenager, I didn't understand most of what was going on. My father HATED John Sirica. He called Watergate a "witch hunt" and looking back, it all seems really familiar now.

Cheryltwin
Автор

Conclusion: absolute honesty steals the thunder of cloak and dagger media.

noskalborg
Автор

It’s very weird that we live in a society where people’s personal feelings toward someone such as envy and hatred can alter the future of nations

truthseeker
Автор

"I am not a croissant." Oh wait, I think that was Biden when he visited France and tried to speak French...(ala John F Kennedy in Berlin)

kevinbroderick
Автор

One ammendment I would make. From what I have read, Nixon's support in the the senate was not 'unsure'. He was told point-blank by the Republican leadership that he would lose an impeachment vote.

maxsmodels