STOP IT! The Great Taking Documentary Film

STOP IT: The Great Taking is a documentary about the legislative effort to restore property rights to financial securities.

Please donate to the production of the film:

This is a uniting issue that affects everyone. It is not partisan, everyone is affected, black or white, rich or poor, conservative or liberal . No one wants their investments in stocks and bonds to be used by Wall Street for their own gain. Get involved today! Get to know your state legislators. Your life savings are at risk. Bills can easily be floored to amend the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in your state to restore property rights to securities (stocks and bonds).

Contact your state legislator and ask them to restore property rights to your stocks and bonds by revising Article 8 of the UCC!

Find who they are and call today!

The Great Taking Report is a detailed exposition of the issue of property rights to all financial securities. Highlighting primary source documents, it outlines the risks to all investors in securities. Whether you are an individual investor, a securities lawyer, a fund manager, a state legislator or concerned citizen, The Great Taking Report is designed to arm the reader with the technical understanding of the risks the indirect holding system poses for modern investors, the magnitude of the threat they pose, how the legal structure enacted in the 1994 Article 8 revision of the UCC came to be, how to mitigate these risks and most importantly, how to fix the UCC to restore clear title to securities. 

DISCLAIMER: The Great Taking Report is the work of James Patrick. David Webb has helped James with the Report but receives no financial benefit form the Report.

[jdf]

We got a rude awakening 5 years ago. More documentaries need to come. Thank you James & David!

[boardwalkbw]

This is why everyone needs to understand this "Commercial Code" has always been illegal...its Maritime laws/pirate laws forced on us without our consent. Our country/Constitution is based on Natural Law, not pirate laws.

[happygolucky]

The mechanisms are in place for 'you will own nothing and be happy.' They don't want anyone meddling with what has been put in place. It is absolutely disgusting.

[YankeeStacking]

DO NOT PUT ANYTHING IN THE EQUITY OR BOND MARKETS YOU’RE NOT WILLING TO LOSE 💯 ‼️

[johnwear]

I greatly appreciate David Rogers Webb. He speaks the truth.

[jasonaris]

This happened in 2008

All the while the Lehman’s crisis distracted everyone a broker in Florida went bust. The custodian JPM took the assets they had under management to cover open derivatives positions. The problem? Those assets were not the brokers but their clients

JPM were taken to court but the judge ruled that they were a ‘protected entity’ and they upheld the theft

No one really noticed as the bigger story hid what had happened

[arthursondheim]

Quadrillions of dollars in derivatives (bets on the directions of financial assets) while the global economy is about $60T to $100T. It is mind-boggling But imagine being allowed to borrow $2M on a house worth $200K to bet in the financial markets. It is lunacy.

[OrionsBluff]

Spread the word, this is happening in every country.

[karenisherwood]

Great work, guys. THANK YOU! Head of the snake.

[louiseburnett]

A L L M O R G A G E S A R E F R A U D U L E N T, W H A T D I D T H E Y L E N D Y O U ?

[RedRain_The_artist]

The word "mortgage" comes from the Old French term "morgage, " which literally translates to "dead pledge." The prefix "mort" means "dead, " and the suffix "gage" means "pledge." This term reflects the idea that the pledge is considered "dead" or nullified once the loan is fully repaid or if the borrower fails to meet the terms of the agreement, leading to foreclosure.

[eventbin]

Hearing about this now...all I was taught (brainwashed) from schools and universities that the line of claims to securities are lenders/bond holders, followed by etc..
When did these derivative gamblers get to stand in front of the line?
This is evil and broad daylight highway robbery!

[johngalt]

I will make it easy. My son came to me for $100k loan. I gave him the money. He asked where i got it. I told him i used the equity in my neighbors home. I make money on my neighbors assets without him even knowing. I own his home essentially and he does even know it. And when son default’s on the loan, i will sell the neighbors home to get the money back to myself that i loaned and when the neighbor screams and finds out it was me i have already done this to the entire neighborhood but i also have out 17 other loans on each home….when the shtf i have already moved to my secure location with my secure bank accounts in a foreign country…..

[kathleankeesler]

Have found this necessary to view twice.

[questioneverything]

Thank you so very much for the information it is greatly appreciated

[milo]

Thank you for putting out this documentary

[michaelmcphillips]

"if your account provider, your broker, or your custodian became insolvent you could take immediate return of your securities; that is no longer the case. With the current laws in place it could mean that American families will end up getting crushed, all to protect the big Banks and the billion-dollar institutions."
That's not quite the reality when considering what securities are. When you have a mortgage, the bank keeps the house as a security until it's fully paid for; you don't own it. However, if the bank sells it as a security to profit more from it i.e., using a bunch of them to obtain lending capital, this, in adding cost to the house price and to the housing market price i.e., creating inflation is unlawful and when housing is a constitutional and a human right as well as being unconstitutional it is a rights violation that all countries that signed up to the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights passed into law; it also violates the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.
When people owe money, they must stop spending to pay it off and when too many of them owe money, demand and spending is reduced and creating securities from debt i.e., using debt as money was the solution chosen to keep spending going, banking was unconstitutionally liberalised to enable it, and when that didn't work out money creation by banks was added. This of course, robbed savers of deposit interest - why pay it when they could create money from nothing - which naturally reduced depositor spending and when banks couldn't keep enough reserves to cover their lending the proportion of deposits they had to hold, was reduced in the eurozone to 1% of deposits to help them regardless of the risks including 'runs' associated with banks having lent out 99% of their deposits, which I think are systemic risks not permitted by EU Treaty Article 127 on the prudential supervision of credit institutions and the stability of the financial system.
Anyone in debt is unable to get bank credit without owning something of value at least equal to the amount he or she wants to borrow plus what he or she already owes. When bank regulators allow anyone to sell securities e.g., mortgages based on the total value of goods or properties, they have lent to others to enable them purchase that cannot be lawful for mortgages not yet a year old, i.e., when only a few months of repayments have been made, when those with mortgages have no collateral to cover their future payments and some of them have no jobs yet that is what caused the 2008 financial crisis and taxpayers were forced to pay for them when bailing out the banks and the speculator security creators holding the uninsured securities while those who sold the mortgages retained their profits.
The profits from producing goods and providing services are controlled by demand for them and those of them that are essential for life and health cannot lawfully be made unaffordable for any citizen therefore those who make them unaffordable violate constitutional and human rights. When it's now mostly if not always done using securities those creating them break the law and are responsible for the consequences.
Investors and brokers buying food in e.g. Africa at very low prices to sell at a higher profit in Europe or America act unlawfully in increasing global food market prices when food is also a constitutional and human right entitlement, there are food shortages everywhere, and there is available food where it is grown and consumed. The same applies to energy, medical care, and the utilities providing necessary social services, all of which the government must ensure that they remain affordable for all including the old, low incomed, and unemployed.
Those using borrowed money and securities break the law when increasing the money in circulation without the goods that must be produced and the earnings from making or providing them to prevent inflating the price of the existing goods for sale therefore the higher the inflation and money devaluation for depositors from this.
Buying money on the global money markets to increase profit when selling it is another constitutional and human rights violation in increasing currency valuation for those holding it but increasing costs for those owing it - a higher value euro e.g. buys more goods for those with it so repaying a euro repays more goods than before it increased in value - and increasing inflation where it's spent. These are all enabled with securities and is therefore unconstitutional and unlawful.
Velocity of Money is the number of times that a unit of currency is spent to buy goods and services in a period of time, one year normally. Derivative securities are created in the financial economy and remain there as credit but increase the money in circulation - the borrowings - in the real economy without producing any goods or services in it; they increase prices in the real economy, which it has to repay the borrowings with interest to those providing the borrowings in the financial economy mostly now in tax havens, which of course reduces the resources of the real economy, increases the taxes by including them in the interest it charges for the borrowings, and lowers its GDP. The more such money there is invested the less the existing GDP is worth and the more this reduces the velocity of money (the less often the same dollar or euro is spent in one year) in the real economy i.e., the less retail sales in the shops. As VOM equals GDP divided by Money in circulation the more of the latter the lower the velocity of money, real GDP and incomes and the higher are food prices, rents, house prices, energy costs and other of life's necessities in the real economy where most citizens live and work.
It is unconstitutional for a small number of individuals or corporations to be allowed to control the cost of the necessities of life for profit i.e., to unjustly exploit most people and when along with government unconstitutional borrowing and spending of borrowed unpaid future taxes, reduces them to slavery, since sovereign bonds of unlawful borrowed unpaid future taxes are also securities and criminal assets held by investors and banks and together often valued at more than all the goods and services in real and financial economy GDPs, those creating them are guilty of the harmful consequences and so dematerialising them to reduce them to a constitutional price seems more than justified; it is a moral and lawful imperative. Of course, when not applied to government bonds even when they exceed the value of GDP and the lenders providing them are in tax havens, which should not exist and which no government with integrity would borrow from or permit business with, when they have greater property rights and pay less taxes than the citizens who must repay the bonds must pay.

In the financial crisis of 2008 and the mortgage market crash when all the banks were issuing their assets of future tax and other mortgages as securities to obtain lending capital, which was unconstitutional and unlawful, and also, when securities were, as the film claims. 'dematerialised', anyone with a mortgage including those employed with future unpaid tax mortgages should have lost part of them to the banks to enable them pay those they sold securities of them to, but instead the taxpayers not employed with taxes were defrauded when forced to pay for them in the bail outs with more of their unlawfully levied future taxes.
"From these Conventions the Constitution derives its whole authority. The government proceeds directly from the people; is "ordained and established" in the name of the people; and is declared to be ordained, "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and to their posterity." The assent of the States, in their sovereign capacity, is implied in calling a Convention, and thus submitting that instrument to the people. But the people were at perfect liberty to accept or reject it; and their act was final. It required not the affirmance, and could not be negatived, by the State governments.
Creating money from nothing for some citizens as wealth and as debt to be paid by most citizens, their children and future generations, is a travesty of justice, a criminal fraud on the people and their and their children's enslavement when everything spent, owned, owed, and borrowed by those paid with their unconstitutionally levied future taxes in America's $36 trillion debt must be repaid by them too; a perverse interpretation of the Constitution and the law.

[treehill]

So if I don't own the securities, does that mean that I don't owe any capital gains taxes on those securities?

[lisae]

Yes this is correct and the threats to personal property held in banks, investment firms, money market accounts, etc are real. The Universal Commercial Code section 8 says, “enable the account provider to "re-use" the security without having to ask for the authorization of the investor.” The bank or firm (or other financial institution) can “re-use” the money you deposited to invest in anything they want. You won’t know about it because they don’t need your permission.

[parallelsystems]

Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth - 1 John 3:18