What does 'Slow Steaming' mean?

preview_player
Показать описание

Slow steaming is a lot more than simply running slower to save money. In this video we explore how it came about and some of the advantages and disadvantages of slow steaming for a modern merchant vessel.

---------------JOIN OUR COMMUNITY----------------

We have launched a new community of maritime enthusiasts over on Patreon.

When you join, you will become part of an Exclusive Community, gain Early Access to our YouTube videos*, receive Exclusive Content* and have influence over Community Videos*

*Everyone becomes a part of our community, but additional rewards will depend on the tier you select.

----------------------WITH THANKS-----------------------

★ DATA

Videos of dockyard and container ship by Tom Fisk from Pexels

★ Music & Sound Effects

-------------------------DISCLAIMER--------------------------

All content on this channel is provided for entertainment purposes only. Although every effort has been made to ensure the content is accurate and up to date, it remains the responsibility of the viewer to determine its accuracy and validity. The content should never be used to substitute professional advice or education.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Slow steaming is a common practice that is often used when cooking things such as dim sims or dumplings.
Oh wait... nevermind.

ThatGuy-vwgc
Автор

Just when you think you've gone down every youtube rabbit hole

adlantian
Автор

In the early 1980's I had several trips where the ship would 'slow steam' . Yes it reduced the fuel bill, and emissions, but it could also increase the crews tip time dramatically. Most trips were on a 6 month basis with the company I worked for but one was exteneded to 9 months purely waiting for the retail price of the cargo to go up. It gets very boring and you end up looking for things to paint!!. We had a very spruce ship by the time we hit port again and could 'pay-off'. my Fiance was very understanding as We had to change the wedding date 3 times.

nickbutler
Автор

The quality of your content more than rewards our 'slow steaming' patience.

waverleyjournalise
Автор

Most of the vessels upon which I served were designed for higher speeds (eg 17 knots) but were generally run at around 14 knots. Exhaust gas boilers were fitted that could supply sufficient steam to run a turbo-alternator that would cover the entire ship's electrical load at sea.
On slow steaming, there was insufficient steam generation so the shortfall had to be made up with a diesel alternator at part load- not ideal for diesel engines. Just another problem down to slow steaming.
Some diesels were prone to design faults leading to frequent and sudden failures. In deep sea, clear of all traffic, a blackout could be avoided by increasing main engine speed to generate more steam from the exhaust gas boiler for the turbo-generator, until another diesel (if available) could be started.

MervynPartin
Автор

I suddenly wanted to add sails on those cargo ships, using wind and fuel together. Sounds fun :)

toveychurchill
Автор

But slow steaming would seem to decrease personnel labor efficiency and reduce revenue due to fewer loads being transported. It's complicated finding the right balance.

terryboyer
Автор

My next tinder date will have a great time during dinner. "By the way, darling, are you aware of all the intricacies of slow steaming?"

ElephantRage
Автор

Slow Steaming is what your channel seems to have been doing for a while.

JK, glad to see you're active again! :)

Quasihamster
Автор

People act as they care for the environment then start complaining when their amazon package is a day late.

RubySapior
Автор

I was honestly worried you'd left YouTube, but kept checking back every month to see if there was an upload. Now have been rewarded with my patience! Great content as always, hope you're doing well and keep making these videos 👌🏽

danielwest
Автор

Excellent content. I’m an airline pilot and the parallels are dramatic. Airplanes are designed for an optimum speed which varies somewhat with the cost of fuel, crews, and maintenance. We generally can go a bit faster to make up time but fuel flow goes up exponentially which could make an otherwise profitable flight lose money.

For long range flights we likewise can have scheduling conundrums: you can sometimes buy two aircraft that can barely cover a route at high speed but have much higher per aircraft and fuel costs, or you can do it a bit slower with much less cost per flight (or per seat-mile) but you’ll need three aircraft to cover the route. Given that widebody airliners can cost upwards of $200 million each on the high end, this can obviously make a given route unviable economically.

HEDGE
Автор

A few years back we used slow steaming to save on fuel costs, however, most engines are designed to run at optimum rpm for proper piston ring sealing, combustion etc. the liner wear lifetime was greatly reduced, we fitted Teflon tubes ion the cooling water bores in combustion areas to raise the liner temperature (cold corrosion was another factor)
So the trade off with fuel cost vs slow steaming was not that simple. Also, adding on days due to slow steaming would increase maintenance, crew costs insurance cost.
Give me an engine at rated peak performance any day, they humm where as SSteaming they rattle and shake.

robert-johnswier
Автор

Why does this video got recommended to me, a person living in the alps and disliking the sea so much that I wouldn't even go there for holiday?

Anyway, it answered questions I didn't even know could be asked and I watched all of your videos and subbed.

But still, miss me with that salty water full of fish and ships.

jumi
Автор

Most people: Slow Steaming for efficiency.
Me: Haha 50 knots go

ajaxengineco
Автор

I'm going to take Bachelor of Science and Maritime Transportation soon and this channel truly helps me. Thank you lad.

hydarara
Автор

I can't believe I clicked on this. I first went to sea in 1973, joined big oil tankers in 1977, retired in 2016. I remember leaving Ras Tanura around the Cape to go to Savona at 30 RPM on a 264, 000 ton VLCC. Chuck an empty beer can over the side and you would see it for ages. At such low speeds there was no bleed steam from the turbines, so the auxiliary systems needed live steam, pushing up bunker costs. Once The Company realized this, we moved faster, but went to almost shutdown at the destination. More time for fishing - and at Freeport, Bahamas, we made lobster pots - oh yes!

GraemeSPa
Автор

Bring back the old style merchant ships! Single funnel with boiler and engine in the center, barely making 13 knots 😂

supertrinigamer
Автор

Yet another brilliant video, such a pleasant content and delivery. I could listen to you for hours on end. Thank you! Your channel is wonderful! Don't change a thing!

guillaumeromain
Автор

I have just discovered your channel. Like a very good book one cannot put down, I watch one video after another despite it being well after midnight. I am learning so very much through your detailed presentations. Excellent!

noelgeorgette