I do not need a job in US-Tech as my Riemann Hypothesis Proof passes acid test of RSA algorithm

riemann hypothesis
riemann zeta function
did you know
fermat's last theorem
imaginary numbers
riemann
complex numbers engineering mathematics
numerische integration
zeta function
analytic number theory
bernhard riemann
calculus and analytic geometry
collatz conjecture
complex analysis engineering mathematics
complex numbers
computational finance
critical value hypothesis testing
fast fourier transform
fermat's last theorem proof
formula de euler
functions of logistics management
hypothesis in research
indian mathematics
jacques vallee
mathematics
physics
plugged
prime numbers
real numbers and imaginary numbers
riemann hypothesis explained
riemann hypothesis proof
simplex
simplex method in operation research
testing of hypothesis engineering mathematics
theoretical framework in research Did you know
didyouknow
did you know
did you know channel
did you know daily
did you know it

#riemanhypothesis #riemannhypothesis #riemannhypothesisexplained #riemannhypothesissolved #riemannhypothesisproof #riemannhypothesisnumberphile #riemannhypothesisprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisveritasium #riemannhypothesisquora #riemannhypothesisinhindi #riemannhypothesislecture #riemannhypothesisterencetao #riemannhypothesissolution #riemannhypothesismathologer #riemannhypothesisproofattempts #riemannhypothesisanalyticcontinuation #riemanhypothesisand #riemannhypothesisandprimenumbers #riemannhypothesisandquantummechanics #riemannhypothesisandprimes #riemannhypothesisscienceandmyths #riemannzetafunctionandprimes #riemannhypothesisof1859
#zetazeros #zetafunctionzeros #riemannzetazeros #zetazero0.5 #zetazero0.5zillakami #zetazero0.5instrumental #zetazero0.5reaction #zetazeroslowed #zetazeroalphadisperatoamore #zetazerodarkbeach(slowed+reverb) #zetazeroorbital
#zetazerosand #zetazerosandprimenumbers

Dear Science Community,

I am pleased to present my proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. After 10 years of research and experimentation, I have successfully demonstrated that the Riemann Hypothesis is true. My proof is based on harmonic conjugate of zeta function and its functional equation.

The Riemann hypothesis has been proven in three different ways, each with varying levels of complexity. One approach involves utilizing the functional equation and introducing the concept of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions, similar to the Gamma and Pi functions. The other two proofs are derived using Euler's formula and elementary algebra. By analytically continuing the zeta function to an extended domain, the poles and zeros of zeta values are redefined. Furthermore, other prime conjectures such as the Goldbach conjecture and the Twin prime conjecture have been proven based on a new understanding of primes and numbers as three-dimensional entities, as elucidated by Hamilton's four-dimensional quaternions. The imaginary number iota is defined as the natural logarithm of two, and the logarithm of negative and complex numbers is redefined using an extended number system. Additionally, the factorial of negative and complex numbers is redefined through the use of the Delta function and the periodic harmonic conjugate of the Gamma and Delta functions.

The Riemann Hypothesis is one of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics. Its proof has eluded mathematicians for over a century. My proof not only solves this problem but also opens up new avenues of research in the field of mathematics.

The implications of my proof are far-reaching. It has the potential to revolutionize the way we think about prime numbers and their distribution in the number line. It could also have applications in other fields such as physics, computer science, and engineering.

I am sharing my proof with the science community in the hope that it will inspire others to build on my work and advance the field of mathematics. I am not seeking any monetary compensation for my work. My only goal is to contribute to the advancement of humankind.

[AnnaSocha-mg]

Read the paper and this isnt even close to any rigorous proof. There is a clear lack of any understanding of analysis and its full of basic arithmetic mistakes. I admire the dedication tho and i hope you keep on learning so that one day you might write sth actually worth reading, god bless ☺️☺️☺️

[expmine]

Ragebait for mathematicians!!! Is it just me or is the paper a total mess.

1) No mention/respect for logarithmic branches (Ch. 3 in paper)
2) Incomplete approaches and not proven statements (Ch. 4 in paper)
3) Saying i=ln(2), by using a invalid assumption, but instead of stating that the assumption is false, the wrong statement is used to calculate ln(-1) (Ch.3 in paper)
4) There are no references or sources. Many steps are unexplained
5) The typical structure with Definition, Lemma and Theorem, as well as the numeration of those is missing.
6) The video looks like someone trying to scam and false advertising (which does not have to be the intention/ the case, but it is what it looks like).

Conclusion: You should reflect on your work more.

(PS: Does this site even peer review. I did not see anything about peer reviewing, but I just might be blind. There is no login with university credentials, which does not look professional. I am still studying and do not have experience with publishing papers. For the people who have: Is the website in the description even a professional publishing platform?)

[JwalinBhatt]

I am happy for you and your attempt. I have a question, in section 4.1 where you find r and theta. Then use r*cos(theta) to get the real part, if you use the same to get the imaginary part you get that to be 0. But zeta(1/2+0i) is about -1.46 and not equal to 0.
So my question is why do you use r and theta only for the real part and not for the imaginary part?

[TiberiuMusat]

Great work! Could your algorithm be used yo break HTTPS connections?

[malchemis]

Did you sry used notebooklm to generate the voice for the vid ?

[RSLT]

Sorry for the bad news, but I hope you see that I’m trying to help you and stop you from going in the wrong direction. We want to go north, and you’re currently heading east. : This is not going to help you get a job; in fact, it could do more harm than good. It is impressive that you make AI do this things but I’m telling you this based on my experience working in a tech company in the heart of Silicon Valley. Because it’s easy to tell that this is AI-generated because it lacks a human touch and, more importantly, fails to include logical reasoning or mathematical animations. I’ve seen you publish a lot of videos on RH, and I think you need to understand that AI has zero chance of making logical conclusions. To many, it may seem like AI is a superhero, but in reality, it cannot do what you're trying to do for over decade AI is trying to accomplish simple task like driving and it cannot do it . Your expertise in trying to make AI solve RH is impressive, but it has no chance to do this. The videos you’re posting are a hallucination of AI and have nothing to do with the real world. For example, RH has nothing to do with RSA encryption. I know many people often confuse RSA and cybersecurity and prime numbers, but that’s where the similarity ends.RH is assumed to be true, and proofs confirm that assumption. We have learned pretty much everything about RH, and proofs will not help because we assume it is true. while RSA is based on relative primes for example 8 and 15 or 14 and 25. I’ve watched a Numberphile video on this, and it’s incorrect. So your video Title " Do I get a job in Google/Microsoft as my Riemann Hypothesis Proof passes acid test of RSA algorithm" is enough to show that AI is very incapable of understanding simple problem and offer the solution. Again, I’m sorry to give you bad news, but I thought you could use some help because you’ve put tremendous effort into this, and you won’t get anything out of it. It’s also brave that you’re taking a novel and new approach, but you need to make sure you actually have a real shot. So, change your approach. No more trusting and hoping on AI. Instead, focus on understanding and explaining things with simple methods that even a high schooler can understand. Also remember " FK paraphrased:​ We do not choose to pursue mathematical challenges because they are easy, but because they are hard. We pursue these challenges because they serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, and because they are challenges we are willing to accept, challenges we are unwilling to postpone, and challenges we intend to win."

[LaplaceDemon-ShayanKarami]

It's funny that some kids publish their daydreams as videos on the internet, I suggest that if you really want to become a mathematician, instead of these types of nonsense, go and read classic papers and gain different skills by taking courses online like MIT open courseware, and watch lectures of deferent kinds of researchers.
:)

[FranzBiscuit]

Wow still reading through the paper but so far it does indeed look promising. The approach seems quite novel I must say although the implications with respect with integer factorization weren't immediately clear. My only advice would be to focus on that aspect a bit more and perhaps have the paper re-written in a more conventional format if you really want to see this published. (Currently there is fair amount of commentary that could be pruned out to keep things concise.) Either way this really is an inspirational piece of work. I truly hope you get the recognition you deserve!

[TTishchenko]

What is this channel about ? Looks like fully ai generated content