Twitch Employee MOCKS DR Disrespect Over Lawsuit!

preview_player
Показать описание

🔔 BECOME A GEEKS + GAMERS PREMIUM MEMBER HERE:

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR OTHER CHANNELS

📦✉️
P.O BOX 10057 :
Jeremy Prime
Pensacola
Florida, USA
32524

Check out the Geeks + Gamers video game FACT BLAST!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The burden of proof is on Twitch, not Doc. He doesn't have to show anything; he has already be deemed innocent from a legal standpoint.

JosiahRises
Автор

Guess i'll say this again:
1. Twitch internal Trust and Safety reviewed his case after initial report. Found nothing and closed the case.
2. Lengty arbitration with Twitch after the ban. Lawyers and a JUDGE look at EVERYTHING. Found nothing illegal was done by him. Case settled.
3. Reported to NCMEC by Twitch employee. They find nothing and does not escalate. Case closed.

Christopher Hitchens once said "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". The burden of evidence is on the accuser. They accuse him, they can provide the evidence. All I have seen so far is every time this has been looked into by proper authorities the case is dismissed every single time.

Its true we can argue he is a dumbass for putting himself in this situation yes, but he did nothing horrendously bad.

ankoo
Автор

violating an NDA is a serious and often costly experience

shimtest
Автор

What people are forgetting is that his whispers were deemed NOT sexting by both Twitch internally and by a judge. People who hate Doc will continue to. They want to watch someone fail.

thornysnotsoepic
Автор

Doc should SUE TWITCH ALREADY!! They’ll never stop mocking and attacking him, unless he strikes back with a Lawsuit!

gamerkingdom
Автор

Lots of real pdfs poping everywhere (See Kris Tyson for ex.), but haters really wanna Doc down without proves to condemn him!

IgorLollatoTrevs
Автор

"inappropriate" means next to nothing without context.
Isn't there still 0 proof anything sexual was sent???
People seem to just push whatever story they want.

Star-efdr
Автор

I worked at a place that worked with married couples in crisis. Cheating is not something you hold over someone unless you have explicitly seen they have not changed. That is between him and his wife. Do not apply a judgement to someone else that also leaves you condemned for life.

NeightrixPrime
Автор

Gonna say the same thing when all this drama started "Lets wait and see, period!"
Truth will come out ONE way or ANOTHER!!
IF he is guilty he will pay for that, if he is not, all those haters gonna eat themselves trough rage xD

JessicaGould-zl
Автор

250K viewers with when he gave the statement. 80K when he was still gaming. He is absolutely fine and doesn't care at all about anyones opinion. All the proper authorities have seen the evidence and have not found anything. CASE F## CLOSED. Unbelieveable.

DLTTA
Автор

Jeremy, this isn't that difficult. Doc said he made sure to emphasize certain words knowing that the media was going to create a narrative. He didn't say that what he said was false. Indeed, he admitted in his stream that the conversation included, "Mutual banter and inappropriate jokes." It doesn't contradict anything he's already said.

wesdog
Автор

Cody hasnt tweeted since early august, he's 100% being sued.

Greendore
Автор

If doc didn’t break a law. THEN WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE TALKING ABOUT!!!!

Whaticanthearyou
Автор

I like how everyone is talking about this, instead of the Epstein list.

Azuciea
Автор

As i understood it, his explanation for putting the word Minor in was to catch Cody out saying that he had 1st hand knowledge of the evidence. Doc and Twitch knew there was no minor involved but if Cody ran with it, then Doc produced the findings of the court to people then it goes to show that Cody was not only lying but exaggerated what he knew. It's a clever way to out a source, painful but Doc knew it had to be done to kill the rat.

onemoreriff
Автор

I will say this, I watched a lawyer give his opinion on Doc's response and he has worked with someone that went through the same thing. From the lawyer's perspective, he and another looked at Doc's response to this and the lawyer thinks Doc's take is solid. Take that for what you will.s

Nostaljikone
Автор

1. The messages were not sexual in nature.
2. The person was not a minor.

Case closed.

Kyle__V
Автор

This whole situation is making me not like Jeremy more and more lmao true colors and Jeremy is just playing the jewtube politics

Wakuppeopletheywanttocontrolus
Автор

Anyone else like how Jeremy only reads and watches out of context stuff instead of taking the time to hear it himself this is the issue with people being a source of information and only take half of it sometimes less
Echo chambers are prevalent in every community now

Wakuppeopletheywanttocontrolus
Автор

Well Doc is going to get his justice and Nick is entitled to his opinion but, in the end nobody really wins.

HeavyDr