How wilful ignorance leads to wrong conclusions.

preview_player
Показать описание
This Atheist unfortunately had things all muddled up in his mind. when he he is confronted with the verses he relies on, his argument fails.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Alhamdullilah ... im always looking forward to hear brother Shabir Yusuf speaks. May Allah grant him good health always☺

muhainimaksom
Автор

This man is pretty hilarious. This has been so painful for us to hear, I wonder what shabir has been going through talking to him.

NAK
Автор

I would hate to talk to someone like this. I wouldn't even bother.

AhmadPhilips
Автор

It has been a long winter and it is good to see you guys again alhamdullah

But really this guy is coming up with his own narrative and own logic no matter what the truth might be

somanoma
Автор

Alhamdulillah, thanks for uploading and revealing the truth. Ignorance is the enemy of humanity. Another ignorance captured and shared for us to reflect.

djayawarman
Автор

That ignorance man was right when he said, when you kill one person you actually kill the whole family (infact the whole mankind). He actually was quoting Koran 5;32. Unfortunately he was so ignorance that he didn't realise he just admitted quraan is right although at the beginning he was condemning it.

getaranjiwaramlee
Автор

Such atheists appear to suffer from some kind of emotional trauma; this trauma seems to interfere with their critical thinking skills.

Said made moral claims without providing sound justification to support them:

1. Said claims slavery is wrong, why is slavery wrong?

2. Said claims murder is wrong, why is murder wrong?

Said offered a baseless moral criterion for his condemnation of murder, he believes it's wrong because it causes suffering to the victims family...well then, why is causing suffering wrong?

What if the victim has no family, according to Said's thinking that would be acceptable.

What about the perpetrator, sending him to life in prison causes him suffering and misery, that would contradict Said's moral criterion.

That Said fellow like most emotionally wrecked atheists have my pity, they destroy their intellect and objectivity because they failed to overcome their emotional pain, which leads them to disastrous conclusions.

brothermuhammad
Автор

there is something that i miss in the video witch is saeed 's logic
thx for the video and jazakom allah khayran

لوسيفرجبريل
Автор

Though his thought process and understanding was illogical, his memory was impressive for a drunk

mrhaiku
Автор

salute to muslim guy, what a great patience and tolerance, its the attitude that really matter in debate...

bellatrix
Автор

asalam aleikum. thanks for puting passage og reference. May allah reward you😊

mohassan
Автор

Great illustration to the session title

esquireize
Автор

Those verses he mentioned are complete justice in every sense of the word. It doesn't mean that if my wife is killed, I kill your wife, no. It means if a woman kills a woman, she can be killed. It doesn't mean someone innocent is to be killed. For example, This verse is to clear the stupidity of saying if a woman of high status is killed by a normal woman, then a woman of high status should be killed for her because a normal woman isn't enough for her life.

mystiqur
Автор

Thank you for the video ... we need more though

altairauditore
Автор

I've had similar discussion with Iranians, very frustrating..

rayanmuhammed
Автор

I am feeling like tying this man up, pulling his ear and keep on twisting till he fixes his manner.

sifatzaman
Автор

his body sways as if he was rapping.. yeah dudee xD

alirehman
Автор

. In pre-Islamic Arabia people tried to take blood revenge upon the murderer's family and tribe, and the retaliation corresponded to the value placed on the blood of the victim. Their desire for revenge was not quenched merely by putting the murderer to death. They preferred to put to death tens and even hundreds of people to avenge the one life they had lost. If a respected member of their tribe was killed by an ordinary member of another, it was not deemed enough to put to death the actual murderer. They preferred to kill a man of the murderer's tribe equal in standing to the victim, and even several members of the murderer's tribe. However, if the victim was a man of humble standing from another tribe, and the murderer from their tribe happened to be a man of high standing, they were unwilling to permit the execution of the murderer.

malamakkavu
Автор

At 7:12 Shabir asks Said what does "kisas" mean?
Well, in the English language kisas is street slang for attempting to curry favour with someone for some benefit, usually personal or professional advancement. Also, kisas is commonly referred to as "creeping; sucking up; or brown-nosing". The teacher's pet in primary and secondary school was usually the favourite because they used to be a kisas and always played goody-two-shoes.

as
Автор

THE DETERMIND TO BLAME ISLAM BUT WHEN WORLD SEE HIM HE IS LOOK LIKE FOOL

ferozkhan
join shbcf.ru