Improve InDesign Performance: Efficiently Add XML Elements with AppleScript

Discover how to enhance the speed of adding XML elements using AppleScript in Adobe InDesign with practical tips and a flexible approach!
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How can I improve performance when adding InDesign XMLElements via AppleScript?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Improving InDesign Performance: Efficiently Add XML Elements with AppleScript

If you’re working with Adobe InDesign and AppleScript to create XML tags and elements, you may encounter significant performance issues. For instance, if your script takes an excessive amount of time—possibly hours—to add just a few thousand XML elements, you’re not alone. Many users stumble upon a common pitfall when trying to manage large amounts of data and XML structures. This guide will guide you through improving your AppleScript performance in InDesign.

Understanding the Challenge

When dealing with large datasets, such as a table with 7,000 data points, scripting can become sluggish. In this specific scenario, the issue arose while creating a large root XML element that contained approximately 7,000 child XML elements. Each element being added incrementally slowed down the performance of the script, ultimately causing it to time out due to the overwhelming number of child elements.

Identifying the Symptoms

Slow Performance: Each XML element was taking about 0.5 seconds to process.

Increased Time Requirement: Entire scripts could take multiple hours to complete.

Time Out Errors: Adding more than 5,000 children caused scripts to terminate unexpectedly.

The Solution: Restructuring the XML Hierarchy

The key to improving performance in this case was to change how the XML elements were structured within the script. Instead of creating a single root element with numerous children, the solution involved restructuring the hierarchy. Here’s how to effectively do this:

1. Create Subgroups for XML Elements

Instead of directly adding all elements as children to the root, it's beneficial to divide the XML structure into multiple groups.

Divide the Data: Split the 7,000 elements into smaller groups; in this case, around 480 children (or parent nodes) were created, with each containing approximately 16 grandchildren.

Maintain the Same Total Nodes: The logic behind the script stays intact while optimizing the XML tree structure.

2. Update Your AppleScript Code

Here’s how to implement the changes in your AppleScript code. Start by restructuring your initial repeat loop:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Performance Gains

With this method:

Reduced Processing Time: The script completes significantly faster than the original approach, taking approximately 40 minutes instead of unlimited time.

Manageable Script Performance: This approach avoids time-out errors and makes the script more reliable.

Conclusion

By recognizing the performance pitfalls of adding too many XML elements as direct children to a single root element, you can adapt your AppleScript strategy to enhance efficiency in InDesign. This structured approach—not only saves time but also ensures a more stable execution of your scripts. While it may complicate the linking between tables slightly, the overall benefit far outweighs the potential drawbacks.

So, next time you’re faced with a sluggish AppleScript in InDesign, remember the lesson learned here—structure your XML effectively and enjoy a smoother scripting experience.