4 Weird Questions That Should Make You Question Genetically Modified Skeptic's Education

Mike Winger, Jon of Whaddo You Meme, Cameron of Capturing Christianity, and Brax Hunter get together to thoroughly refute one of the most cringe-worthy YouTube Atheist apologists, Drew the Genetically Cloned Skeptic (tm), who - not to any observant person's surprise - is not a skeptic at all.
  

One may wonder why they need to team up to take on this lone kid.  Well, that's because Drew inexplicably (well not really, he promotes himself as much as Disney tries to shove Frozen down our throats; I mean damn, I don't remember the crazy-popular Lion King, Aladdin, or Hercules having THAT much mass promotion, though there was a lot) has a lot of impressionable followers who simply don't know any better.  And he knows how to manipulate his audience by appealing to emotion; a tactic he directly got from the Kirk Cameroon of Atheism, Hemant Mehta, the not-so-friendly, passive aggressive Atheist (and bottom of the Atheist Apologist barrel).

And I'm sure at least some of you noticed the power rangers esque color diversity; Mike Winger the Blue Ranger, Whaddo You Meme the White Ranger, Brax the Yellow Ranger, and Cameron the Red (or Pink?) Ranger.  Damn I loved the original Mighty Morphin series (one of the cultural stables of the 90s along with Xena the Warrior Princess, the Disney Renaissance, the Attitude Era, and Golden Age of Playstation).  My favorite one was Tommy, and Kimberly was fucking beautiful   (and much of the ass-kicking babes on Xena, got-damn).  But now we have the apologist power rangers, going up against - instead of monsters or aliens - an opposing apologist whose only power is cheap rhetoric, emotional appeal, & commanding a legion of uncultured recovering fundagelicals, and is less intimidating than my king charle cavalier.

[utopiabuster]

I used to listen to "modified skeptic" after he was introduced by "cosmic skeptic" but found him to have just too much soy in him, even more than "cs".
I was raised in a large city where you have to learn about "scam artistry". Lessons well learned to this day. From almost the moment I listened to "ms" I wondered how a grown man, living in the US, allows himself to repeatedly fall victim to scams. I'm no fan of Jehovah Witnesses, but check out his vid where he visited a Jehovah Witnesses building. Thinking and expressing that he would be attacked and thrown out, he was actually invited in, treated very well with utmost courtesy and respect. After that I determined that "modified skeptic" is just another atheist loon.

I'm glad you titled this the way you did since right off the bat "ms" makes the academic mistake of stating that "literature" requires interpretation.
No, since there are several genre's of literature "some" is open to interpretation. Do I see anyone interpreting "It was the best of times, it was the worse of times", or, "A rose by anyother name would smell as sweet", or, "My name is Ishmael", or, "Why does the caged bird sing", or, "Without God all things are permitted".
The Bible consists of several literary genre's and written in several languages over an immense period of time by several different authors, then, yes, much of the Bible requires interpretation from several academic disciplines, including language. But "literature" in and of itself is not prone to interpretation.
What "ms" intends through this bit of ignorance is that authors write in code.
Worse yet, that since all literature is interpretative what's his complaint regarding the Bible?
Maybe "ms" believes the Bible should be a tech manual, or IKEA instruction pamphlet for one of their press board book cases, "The Bibleborjk from IKEA". Haha!
So what, in God's name, is "ms's" complaint?
That he is special and requires the Bible to have been written on his terms according to his education level and ability?

Not only is the Bible the most published book in the history of humanity, but the most read, researched and quoted book, even among secularist, based on a single understanding that Jesus was prophisized, died for our sins, and Resurrected.
Simple!

Some 2.2 billion Christians in the world, encompassing every diverse group and level of education, and some atheist thinks he's entitled to a special invitation into the club.

Maybe "modified skeptic" should try reading a book, instead of believing he's convinced he can actually think, let alone reason, for himself with a monkey brain.

Apt Title PurplePill!
God Bless, all.

[kreatillion]

Regarding that first question about interpretation, everyone seems to forget that Christianity was established on a church, not a bible. Jesus gave certain men authority through the Holy Spirit to carry on his message, and there is only one church that can feasibly claim to teach the same exact message for 2000 years. This church gave us the bible canon: the one, the only, Catholic church.

[parktol]

At least this guys voice is more tolerable than Holy Koolaid’s

[Greenbd]

Oh yes indeed!
“Much better to err on the side of caution and wager for god and live to seek him and please all the Hindu and Muslim apologists👀

[Greenbd]

“Intellectual darkness about god” yikes! That’s ironic coming from Mike Winger

[Greenbd]

So this is interesting. Mike Winger alludes to how bad it would be if someone goes over to atheism but never comes out and says why. Why would atheism be so bad?

[joelkelly]

His first question implicitly endorses ecclesial infallibility, so he's onto something there....