Andrew TRIGGERS RAGEQUIT Keeko On SUBMlSSION Debate

preview_player
Показать описание
📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If a man is making poor choices in leadership then he deserves to get called out so keeko is right even when I don't like her

patrickjennings
Автор

Submission requires following a COMPETENT leader.

garrettelliott
Автор

He said spare money that they basically have that is extra and there's only enough for his game system and not enough to also get her something. As a wife and a mother for 15 years whose husband takes care of our family financially, If he wants something frivolous that I find ridiculous then I would be the first person to tell him that he should get it. Why doesn't he deserve it also. I would have no problem going without this time I'm a smart enough woman to make both of those scenarios work!! I would find that game system for half off or quarter of the price so that I can also get something if I was dead set on.

sophieloves
Автор

I'm confused is he trying to say you should just let your spouse do whatever in the name of submission? Lol that's a weak ass argument

alexa.
Автор

is andrew suggesting a woman remain submissive to a man who is putting financial stress onto his own family for materialistic things?

Octurna
Автор

I've seen that scenario unfold many times. The woman ask the man many things for her. New dress, new shoes, new purse, new jewelry, etc. they have no problem with that. But the moment he spends something on himself: new shoes, new watch, new gaming console, new golf clubs. Then there is a problem. He is irresponsible and she's not submitting.

oxydose
Автор

I don't agree with Andrew. The example of a finantial irresponsable man is very good. I agree that the woman is to the husband like the church is to Christ but Christ gave himself to save mankind out of love, and obvioulsy Jesus is not a tyrant that orders others to submit to his selfish will. That would be equivalent to a irresponsible husband and definetely somebody like him doesnt deserve anybody to submit to him.

cabalgandocontradicciones
Автор

Keeko gave a perfectly reasonable answer and example when it does not make sense for a wife to submit to her husband. I don't like the idea that the woman should always fully and unconditionally trust the man in any decision making. There need to be certain limits. I feel like Andrew is sometimes intentionally refusing to find common ground and being a contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian.

esdev
Автор

I agree on Andrew on a lot of things but this ain't it.. how are you going to forgo logic and submit to a husband that is willingly and selfishly driving the family to bankruptcy? Sounds like he wants absolute submission no matter how illogical, negative or dangerous the husband makes the situation to be. I agree with what Keeko is saying here.

Sanji_Vinsmoke_
Автор

Sorry but Andrew is putting an impossible situation forward and failing and so is falling back on a very orthodox religious stance, and frankly, making himself look like a dick. It seems like he wants to lead the girl on the right down a path with no choices, to ultimate divorce, as he wants to 'prove' that she is not a great partner. Her responses are really good, she's answered the questions, and I wish Brian had moved it on earlier than he did.

mymobile
Автор

2 months ago, when keko started coming on the podcast she was just like the rest of the girls on there. but now it seems like she is starting to see reality in the right prospectives...

epicshoutouts
Автор

As a wife who does NOT submit, I'd like to defend the submissive wives for a moment:

The existence of an EXCEPTION to the rule does not dismiss the EXISTENCE of the rule. If a women believes in submitting yet refuses to submit due to a clear and serious pattern of selfishness on the part of her man, that doesn't make her a hypocrite. The normal rules of engagement don't apply when you're dealing with a toxic person.

MayBlake_Channel
Автор

This is a garbage take, Andrew. Keeko is correct in this instance.

dlh
Автор

The first girl gave a great answer and Andrew kept making up what-ifs until she said something he could disagree with

jameswiley-benes
Автор

Really feel sorry for Andrew's family. He sounds like a horrible person to be around.

kalllll
Автор

Andrew is nitpicking here. Also implying that the man can do no wrong. That is chauvinistic and reeks of a dictatorship. Do u want to run your household like that? My lady submits and has no say-so even when i foolishly do things against the family. Cmon, son.

leebishop
Автор

Keeko is right on this one. Leading the family is making good choices.

jamesharrold
Автор

You really need to stop bringing on like 8 4 maximum, they talk over everyone too much and they derail conversations with their 10 minute side stories that have nothing to do with the conversation being had.

briansearle
Автор

Oddly enough keeko answered well, Andrew little wrong on this

cnh
Автор

Gaming device vs a damn purse… any purse worth as much as any gaming device is not worth it.

mousie