Karol Sikora Interview - The pandemic will be over, as soon as we stop talking about it

Professor Karol Sikora is a British physician specialising in oncology and a leading world authority on cancer. A double first at Cambridge, a PhD and fellow at Stanford University, and Clinical Director for Cancer Services at Hammersmith for 12 years . He has published over 300 papers written or edited 20 books and is on the editorial board of several journals. He was a member of the UK Health Department’s Expert Advisory Group on Cancer, the Committee on Safety of Medicines and he was the Chief of the W.H.O. Cancer Program.

Nothing in this discussion provides medical advice or any form of diagnosis or treatment of any kind. Medical decisions should be made by the patient’s physician who alone can consider knowledge of the patient’s medical history and condition. All information provided here is for general informational purposes and not medical advice to users.

Schedule
02:01 Why are you critical of the response to COVID?
12:34 The bias of the BBC
16:51 Vaccines and Big Pharma
20:11 Vaccine Mandates
21:46 Natural immunity better than vaccine immunity
24:11 Herd immunity is the only way out of the pandemic
25:41 Medics should not be forced to be vaccinated against COVID
28:41 Children should not be vaccinated against COVID
30:11 The yellow card reporting system
34:55 Treatments for COVID are not great
40:11 The suppression of dissent
41:26 Blanket testing for COVID should be stopped
45:26 I’m an anti-masker
51:13 Is there any way to counteract the undue fear in society now?
53:53 How do we get to the end of the pandemic? It ends when we say it ends.
57:56 How will history judge us?

[chasekard]

well done Philip. You are the best interviewers around. I agree with Prof Sikora although he downplayed the jab adverse reactions (ADR). As a former specialist in pharmacovigilance the MHRA's attitude to the ADRs is astonishing. Their website describes all the serious ADRs like transverse myelitis, myocarditis etc but brushes these off as rare, but expected and of no consequence. The attitude is one should expect these when so many people have been vccnted and it would be far worse if they got the infection. However the signals given by these astonishing numbers would in normal circumstances result in immediate cessation and a thorough examination of all the data. If any Pharma company had given the excuses the MHRA is trotting out to explain these ADRs they would have been pilloried and charged with malfeasance. Karol mentioned thalidomide. Remember this treatment was still going on months after the birth defects had been seen and just put down to random chance. It was an Australian paediatrician who first put the data together in a review thus raising the alarm before any action was taken And it was the Sunday Times which brought the scandal to the public notice. Interesting that Karol also mentioned the poor record keeping systems in the NHS which if true is a disgrace. I remember they paid Billions in the early part of century before abandoning a new system. However there should by now have been a major record linkage study to follow up all who have been vcnated vs unvacntd. They can identify all given jab, they have GP records which would then link all to outcome. They have hospital records which would link to admissions, diagnosis etc and they have mortality data. So each patient can be followed for outcome right up to and including death. This would be far more useful than the Yellow Card System which is really only a signal detection system and has many flaws not least the unknown under-reporting. It would answer all the concerns. The fact that nothing has been reported so far indicates it has not been done (otherwise if the vccss were safe they would be shouting about it) or it has been done and they are keeping quiet about the results.

[KingRichardfirst]

I couldn’t agree more. And, I’m really glad these interviews with academics are bringing some truth in regards to so many lies used to manipulate the cattle.
I’m going to share it to everyone!!

[davelowe]

The media response is the result of what an economist would describe as a perverse incentive. They will prioritise only that which sells, irrespective of its veracity or any other factor.

[MrYagod]

Графики болезней и общей смертности стремятся вверх. Идёт настоящее социальное, экономическое, информационное угнетение части Человечества, которое имеет доступ к средствам массовой информации