The #1 Mistake People Make When Studying Poker

GTO Wizard helps you to learn GTO and analyze your game.

🧙‍♂️GTO Wizard
• Study any spot imaginable
• Practice by playing vs. GTO
• Analyze your hands with 1-click
• Works on Desktop/Mobile/Tablet

---------------------------------------------------------------
Tombos21 teaches you how to "see the forest through the trees". Learn to focus on the broader strategic factors that actually matter.

---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------

#GTOWizard #GTO #Poker

0:00 - Big picture
1:25 - 1 Spot 3 Solvers
5:56 - Simplicity vs Complexity
14:02 - Thresholds
21:58 - Compare hand classes
25:04 - Utilize Filtering
30:14 - Compare ranges
32:35 - Turn reports
36:33 - Look at opponent's response
47:13 - Flop reports
51:47 - Conclusion

[burakbey]

Great content. I have a paid subscription to upswing poker, which has a lot of great content, but it really gets into the weeds. These videos strike a nice balance between presenting the high level ideas, while still going into some detail in order to highlight the overarching strategy. Thank you for making these lectures available to all.

[stevecelino]

I can't believe this content is free. GTOWizard is on it's way to taking over this space completely.

[VitrixOne]

this content is so high value! rly thankful that youre putting this out for free

[emotionsoflifetoday]

28:50 made me laugh out loud "the button's range is trash" 🤣🤣

[FireIsBorn]

@GTOWizard Lots of useful information. From the whole video though, I didn't get where you talk about that "#1 mistake" actually?

[CancelIFR]

Better than 99% of the Run It Once Elite videos.

[PoliteAF]

It always bothered me when youtubers would use one solution (like piosolver's here) while analyzing the hands of solver-studying players, and then say things like "you'd never be in this spot if you were playing anything resembling a GTO strategy". The fact that pio was the only solver here to have a 0% chance of taking the 3/4 pot bet is a great example of why (even if correct) that is a rushed conclusion that needs further explanation.

[aquababy]

I've watch some Nick Howard videos and intuition comes up in his criticism of Janda's more analytical approach. Carrell is another who's critical of GTO in favor of intuitive expertise. The method presented in this video gives a decent idea for where intuitive expertise can give your learning an added dimension and how to explicitly develop skilled post flop performance. Nick himself suggested with a comment on bluffs and bluff catching as exploit vs counter exploit that the river is the most important round to study.

[ncannavino]

Awesome lecture yet again. Idea for next time: donk betting and sizing

[ajg]

This was awesome. I'm very impressed this is free. Thank you so much.

[simplyxskilled]

humbly, one of the best videos of the channel. this knowledge is more important than any strategic tips.... and it comes pre loaded with those by nature

[ludviglindstrom]

One of the best poker videos I’ve seen!!

[tobiaskarl]

Who can provide me with proof that you can play profitably with GTO at 6Max in the long run if 5 opponents do not play according to GTO ?
I played many games with pokersnowie and what struck me is
that there is a lot of calling when I prefere to fold because with GTO you assume your opponent is bluffing a lot. But if the opponent never bluffs, it's gloriously lossy.

[luckvoid]

why is overbetting the underpairs at 23:00 the most efficient choice? surely check folding would be safer? thanks for the video its excellent content

[GTOWizard]

Which topic would you like us to cover in the next coachings?

[lukekali]

Big thanks for that video. Now I know how to use GTOW and how approche to learning strategy. 🙏🤓

[andersnielsen]

Biggest mistake is that people seem to forget that every study or analyze is based on history and then they apply their "learned" knowledge in future situations just like a bot or a machine. They forget that every single hand is a new bet, and therefor it should be analyzed as such. E.g: This guy here seems to do so in this spot, so therefor I will play like this, everytime i play this guy again, because that is what my study and analyzes tell me. But you do not consider any other reasons for the play that guy did in that specific session or hand, you base your "knowledge" on. Was he drunk? Was he distracted by someone talking to him? Was he on tilt? Especially online people rely way too much on their hud's and it is so easy to exploit.

[hymnofashes]

Does GTOWizard ever recommend finding a donk who will stack off with one pair and then pretending to be loose and aggressive with erratic behavior and showing quick bluffs and using table talk to goad him into calling when your range once you bet the river is just the nuts?

[RPEpsilon-lcvm]

what options are there for complex solvers?

[Alexandertygreat]

Ive never heard heuristics in a sentance in my life and now it's in every gto poker video. The english language has a massive vocabulary, lets try and use it yall? Love the videos though, appreciate the content. It is funny how GTO solvers pretty much tell us what we were doing already was done good. I do believe using advanced game theory in thr average live game can cost great players alot of EV with over bluffing and over calling too much.