The Dark Power of 'Idea Laundering' with Noelle Mering

preview_player
Показать описание
Ever wondered how new terms you had never heard of like “woke,” “transgender,” “privilege,” are suddenly everywhere? It’s seems like overnight these words just show up and are being spoken about by everyone. It doesn't just happen. It's planned. In a shorter, follow-up to Matthew Leonard's recent full interview with Noelle Mering, they discuss:

- How Our Language is So Quickly Manipulated
- Why Teacher’s Unions are Hotbeds of Activism (Pay attention, parents!)
- The Destructive Role of John Dewey
- The Danger of Disney (Sorry Walt)
- How to Fight Against This Onslaught Attacking Our Families

SHOW CORRECTION - John Dewey isn't the founder of the Dewey Decimal System.

🟢 Join Matthew on a 5 Star PILGRIMAGE to the HOLY LAND

(No credit card. No cancellation necessary. Just sign up and watch!)

“There is NOTHING like this in "Catholic-land" online.” Dave
“Blown away by how much I’m learning.” Ann
“My chin is still on the floor! Amazed” Yolande

PLEASE HELP ME SPREAD THE CATHOLIC FAITH BY SUPPORTING THIS CHANNEL & PODCAST!
OR

▶️ Please like and SHARE this video by clicking the SHARE button
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

CORRECTION - I mistakenly identified John Dewey as the founder of the Dewey Decimal System. My bad. It was Melvil Dewey.

MatthewLeonard
Автор

Yes, yes and yes. I have been in special education for 8 years and went through a university program for becoming a principal. The activist atheistic relativistic mindset permeates everything. Children in all grades are expected to do projects where they are solving a problem in their community, of course leading to the activist mindset. As I heard someone else say, it makes no sense to have people educating your children who hate you. I don’t have children, but if I did, we would homeschool.

EvieGevie
Автор

Re: Disney - Jonathan Pageau's analysis of Moana is fascinating and eye opening.

DavidMatias
Автор

When you mentioned about that fake research a team published to prove a point - that you can start with a conclusion and then write a paper that looks convincing, I immediately (we're in year B after all) remembered something Dr. Bergsma said in his book on the dead sea scrolls. It was about how someone put forth the idea that St. Paul didn't write Ephesians. He had this thesis-synthesis idea that didn't fit with St. Paul writing Ephesians.

ashwith
Автор

Semi-quoting from a different source:

"In essence, idea laundering works through systemic infiltration of ideological malfeasance in the peer-review process.

1.) Put ideological consequentalism over accuracy of knowledge.
2.) Obtain peer-reviewer status(under peer review).
3.) Fraudulently peer-review something. That is, if it fits in with your worldview, support it even if it’s complete nonsense. (
Once done, the item in question then becomes “credible knowledge.” It can be cited as a part of knowledge, or even science, even though it’s flawed or fraudulent.) "

eric
Автор

I was a child.Children can be whimsical, impres-
sionable, as well as temptable.What is happening
is individuals who need credibility, hunger after
legitimacy, thrist after influence, have turn up there
Edward Bernays, John Dewey game.You have indi
-viduals who cannot control their hubris, egoism,
egotism, and intellectual tyranny, but they fancy to
control the innocent, the vulnerable.ADONAI knew there would be days like this, but are finite, limited beings with improper perspective cannot even be
-gin to discern what is happening 🤔 🕊 🙄 ADO
NAI got us where HE wants us 🤓 🙃 🤔 🤭 😏 🙂😎

leonpope
Автор

"punching down", "toxic", "white supremacy", "neoliberal", "grifter", "bigot", "...phobe", etc. etc. etc. etc.

paulaustinmurphy
Автор

Yes, idea laundering is real e.g. normative being used in place of normal, empathy being used in place of sympathy.

The word normative is derived from the pseudo-intellectual, garbage word: heteronormative. The word heteronormative is used in fourth wave feminism. feminism is a political ideology from Satan.

The word empathy being used in place of sympathy is an infantile attempt at vaunting one's own standard of compassion. Empathy is more rare and more metaphysical than sympathy.

For every instance in which the word empathy is used among the pseudo intelligent in the discourse of our political culture, 99.99 % of the time, the word sympathy should be used instead but, is not.

Ultimately, the use of the word normative and the incorrect use of the word empathy are the surest verbal examples of verifiable stupidity out of the mouths and minds of idiots existing in all professions and in all socioeconomic strata everywhere.

On a scale of 1 to 10, my level of respect for the intelligence of a person who uses the word normative Falls passed 0 and is rooted firmly in the realm of negative integers.

Idiots. They're the blind leading the blind. All of them.

Thank you for this good minicast.

matthewvelazquez