Keep your next.js code cleaner by doing this simple rename #shorts

[alext]

( route ) simple omits that segment from the url. Its children are still valid routes.

_route will omit the route and its children if you need a components folder

[nagarajansubramani]

Ah cool, so what you're saying is folders with (...) naming is for developer convenience to organize content without messing up routing, while the ones without (...) are for actual routing. Neat tip! 🔥

[IvanRandomDude]

Also allows to have custom layout for these pages

[curiouslycory]

This is a great tip if you have a lot of page routes and don't want to make your url longer.

[EmmanuelOdii]

Thanks bro, you've saved me a tonns

[johndevnoza]

Thanks! I love to organise folders but it wasnt woeking and now i know why! Yet very basic and simple bug hugh pain removing for me.

[NdondoMicheal]

What would be the alternative way if using the pages folder?

[Oshimani]

Ahh, here it is 😂
That's quite cool, I need to try the app router soon, but it is not supported by T3 yet, isn't it?

[ayushgogna]

i really like app router but the only thing annoyes me that if i want to use the full app as client side i have to use "use client" on top of every page.

[martiananomaly]

Wait.. do people really make a dedicated log out page?

[putranugraha]

What file icon do you use on this video ?

[pharmokan]

does this folder naming work on windows?

[doreto]

This is one of the reasons why the next app route is so bad. Having to workaround for page.tsx matching is terrible design from Vercel part.