Fosterhjemskampanjen 2011.mov

[marilun]

@marilun1968

Her skjer det at barnet blir tatt bort fra de biologiske foreldrene fordi at her ble det ikke gitt foreldrene/mor/far noe tiltak som kunne lette situasjonen med barnet/barna?

[bpasph]

Ja, en mer effektiv måte å lage republikanere på skal man lete lenge etter.

[bubbah]

Those kids would be MUCH worse off if they hadn't been removed from their abusive parents.

[bubbah]

What happens when parents abuse the child? That is far worse than the child being without its parents.

[bubbah]

No, you can take someone away if they are being abused. Before a child is taken over, they try all other possible ways to fix it. Taking away the child is the very last resort, and even then it has to be approved by the justice system. You are ignorant.

[bpasph]

Det andre har du heller ikke dokumentasjon for å hevde.

[BenteVienberg]

SNIK SNAK! Ligesom i det danske kongehus. Kom dog til lommerne, kongeriger!

[bubbah]

Fool. You might want to read the actual research. They are actually pointing out themselves that it's impossible to do a good comparison because they don't have a group that was as bad off as the ones that were taken away from their abusive parents, but still stayed.

The Swedish paper did not look at two comparable groups. They looked at two groups that were as comparable as possible. The group that was allowed to stay with their parents was FAR better off in the first place.

[bubbah]

You are lying. Taking away a child is the absolute last resort, and before that happens you have to get approval from the justice system.

[bubbah]

So you abused your child, and you expect people to accept that and not do anything? WTF.

[bubbah]

Your opinion is utter nonsense. Also, isn't Arild Holta that crazy guy who never gets anything right?