Karl Popper on the Open Society (1974)

preview_player
Показать описание


#Philosophy #Popper #OpenSociety
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks! Hope you upload more videos of Popper!

rodrigosilveira
Автор

Thankyou Dear for Uploading this....Greetings From India🥰❤

Bharati_
Автор

The video cuts out the bit before he states the easy changes to constitutions. At 2.44

BinanceUSD
Автор

Does George Soro's "Open Society Foundation" has anything to do with open society?

chaselee
Автор

It's all an experiment to philosophers. But there's a distinction with scientific and social experiments. Plus they're much more costly and the results can rarely be reproduced over a small period of time.

praveenkumardhankar
Автор

Karl popper on "Absolute Truth"
Please reupload that video.

heder
Автор

One of the founders of our modern world!

predragnikitz
Автор

One of the founders of the 21century agenda

newbbietrader
Автор

Hvad er det Karl Popper snakker om her?

VilladsClaes
Автор

Popper se refiere a una sociedad en la que se pueda respirar y pensar libremente, donde cada individuo tiene valor y la sociedad no impone restricciones innecesarias a las personas. Los enemigos de la sociedad abierta son principalmente los fascistas, los nazis y las dictaduras comunistas, aunque en ese momento la dictadura comunista estaba aliada con los países occidentales.

rantym
Автор

The herald of the Habiru Anti-national League.

neriodante
Автор

There isnt a modern government on earth smart enough, capable enough, and nimble enough to accomplish this hyper pragmatic approach to its politics. Nor is there a civilian base anywhere in the world willing enough to grant such free reign required of a government to socially engineer at the level he describes throughout his work.

The paradox of Popperian politics is that it is inevitably closed. It looks to limit a government "just so" while allowing it the necessary power of coercion to socially engineer; but at whose behest and towards what ends? Once you answer those two questions, you have closed your doors. I've always felt that his ideology was best digested as a liberal fantasy, something you only use in a thought experiment that has left the world behind for the purely abstract. While his approach may be an extreme, it still might be a useful polemic, but it is not realistic.

I'd also add that his pragmatic approach is in direct conflict with pragmatic theories of truth. We don't run experiments and find new data just to restructure our entire theory. We blend the two and conform them in ways that uphold what has been previously held as truth

pathofthegamer
Автор

"Democratically elected parliaments have too much power." - member of silver-tongued minority that definitely isn't trying to take control

locomotive
Автор

As a fellow Ashkenazi jew, Open Society values are of existential importance!

SurfbyShootin
Автор

Man's achievement is to have created a world of rhyme, in the intimate imagination, which is as real in its way as any country on the map. Sir Karl Popper, in one of his most important papers, calls it "The Third World" or "World 3". The first world is the objective world of things. The second world is my inner subjective world; but, says Popper, there's a third world, the world of objective contents of thoughts. Teilhard de Chardin calls this third world the "Noosphere", that is, the world of the mind.

nkenchington
Автор

flaws of constitutions, but I didn't hear an option.

frigidtsunami
Автор

His definition of democracy is very bourgeois

dgib
Автор

Every political person wants power and more of it and some are prepared to do what it takes. Nice guy then into 😈

BinanceUSD
Автор

But the idea something can't be true unless it is susceptible to the possibility of falsification is logically absurd.

James-lljb
Автор

This man is a genius but he creates rivers of blood with his ideas

bodnariucdan