Specific Relief Act (Section 17-19) | Specific Relief Act | Arpita Yadav

preview_player
Показать описание
In this session, Arpita Yadav will be discussing the "Specific Relief Act (Section 17-19)", with the help of theory and MCQs for aspirants preparing for Judiciary exams.

Specific Relief Act (Section 17-19) | Specific Relief Act | Arpita Yadav

🙏 Welcome to Crack Judiciary Channel, your one-stop solution for all Judiciary Exams 💯India’s Top Educators will be teaching you daily on this channel. We will cover the entire syllabus, strategy, updates, and notifications which will help you to crack All Judiciary exams 🎯

During the live session, our Educators will be sharing a lot of Tips and Tricks to crack the exam. Judiciary Aspirants who are preparing for their Exams will be benefited from this channel. Unacademy platform has the Best Educators from all over the country, who take live classes every day ✔️

Arpita Yadav and other Top Educators take classes on Unacademy App.
Use Special Code “ARPI10” to get 10% off on your Unacademy Subscription 😍

Do Subscribe and be a part of the community for more such lessons here:

Download the Unacademy Learning App here:

Unacademy Subscription Benefits:
1. Learn from your favorite Educator
2. Dedicated DOUBT sessions
3. One Subscription, Unlimited Access
4. Real-time interaction with Educators
5. You can ask doubts in a live class
6. Limited students
7. Download the videos & watch them offline

#section17SRA #section18SRA #Section19 SRA #SpecificReliefAct #2018Amendment #SRA #Lawexam #judicialserviceexam
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanku so much ma'am....ur explanation is too good...I will be in waiting for next video....aap ke padhane se phle yeh subject ekdm clr nhi tha

animeshkumar
Автор

Lucid langugae with clear explanation, the way ma'am gives examples makes easy to understand

nikhilwankhade
Автор

Mam I have a doubt . As you have given the example in Sec 18 in which A wants to purchase a BMW car but B wants to sell his Honda city car . So how the question of specific performance be arised as there is no consensus ad idem and hence the contract is void !!

KaranSharma-doiy
visit shbcf.ru