Mojo 🔥 - SuperSet of Python

Mojo is a new Programming Language developed by Modular.
It is a super set of Python and its very fast.

Check out our courses:

Coupon: TELUSKO10 (10% Discount)

Coupon: TELUSKO10 (10% Discount)

Coupon: TELUSKO20 (20% Discount)

For More Queries WhatsApp or Call on : [phone]

Udemy Courses:

More Learning :

Donation:
PayPal Id : navinreddy20

#python #mojo

[lowkeygaming]

This is exciting for a Python dev like me. Speed of development + Speed of execution in one language will be hard to beat.

[christophervasanth]

Naveen garu, your explanation is brilliant while remaining simple enough for easy comprehension. Thank you and keep it up.

[TimStCroix]

The only mention of Mojo on Wikipedia is a footnote on the Python page where it explains the 35, 000x speedup of the Mandelbrot algorithm is due to it's being 'embarrassingly parallel.' For matrix calculations it's only (!) 5, 000x faster. While I have no doubt that it will be blazingly faster in most use cases than Python it's best not to bandy around *35, 000 times faster* whenever talking about it.
Wikipedia also points out the Mojo still lacks classes so it's not a drop-in replacement for Python for libraries that use them.

[InssiAjaton]

My needs for most any language have revolved around hardware I/O. That is, I have needed to communicate with a multitude of measuring instruments. My first personally acquired software was a FORTH for the first TRS80 (that the company had and I was able to boot it to my FORTH in the after hours). Later on, I got other versions for the newer computers, that time my own. But I also got to revive my early time share Dartmouth Basic in form of HP Basic on my own HP-87. That is where the IEEE-488 became my instrument controller interface with the HP Basic. After that I have tinkered with half a dozen other FORTH versions, a Modula-2 and some GW Basic, more Quick Basic, again some Z-80 assembly, Motorola 6800 and 68 000 assembly. But beyond those, the direct access to I/O ports was deemed "bad idea". To me, the bad idea was, when I would need to buy or lease expensive driver sets, and for example the only hardware port interface library that any of my Python books describe is too round-about for my aging brain. My latest (great) instrument, Agilent 34411 promised working with Windows, but needed the old Internet Explorer installed. And where is THAT now? I may need to turn my attention to some Arduino or other kit. Or maybe just give up...

[aswinharish]

I was reading a blog about Mojo🔥 and I was amazed, suddenly your video’s notification came ❤

[srs.shashank]

Will Mojo be widely adopted if mojo is not opensource ?

[danield.]

This is exciting. I was eyeing Julia because of performance but I definitely will watch hoe mojo develops.

[sandeshbk]

typescript is taking over javascript and mojo will take over python ..things are changing really fast

[tensorlab]

You are confusing computer science with Software Engineering, both are entirely different.
The historical aspect of why Python was adopted as language of choice in DS is incorrect, the researchers you talk about are some of best computer scientists and are proficient in multiple programming languages (I have done my masters under them), in-fact, languages like R, C/C++ and MATLAB are basics in courses for Mathematics, Physics and Engineering in Western countries. Which is why early ML frameworks were actually based on these languages. People in academia have been using these to build functioning models in their domain.
The primary reason python was adopted was, to have people working on models have primary focus on functioning of ML models, all the ML libraries use C++ at its core (Ex: NumPy) or derivative of it CUDA (TensorFlow or PyTorch). This was to have a common language for designing ML systems in wild, and python supporting OOPS gave it leverage.
This was to ensure, people working on ML models are not coding focused but rather have understanding of the ML algorithms.

[akasha]

Here is the actual start of Python'! 🔥

[hackerhacker]

Always you have clear content and nice explanation love from odisha

[g.badarivishal]

Speed plays 2nd or lesser fiddle in GUI environment. Want speed, may look odd, awkward etc. etc. it is DOS.
Ofcourse, we cannot get back in time.
As overhead grows speed lessens.

[mullergyula]

Python is such a flexible language. Creating Mojo with all these features and boosting speed so much sounds like a real challenge to me. I would not expect full compatibility, just a reasonable migration path.

[scottk]

Since Mojo supports current Python code, and converting Python code to use Mojo's speed boosts is pretty straightforward, I wonder if there will be a rush to just drop-in replace the Mojo system in place of the Python 3 interpreter. I'm going to start learning this ASAP, as I bet there will be jobs posted for converting code to Mojo for the speed boost. ie: 'fn' in place of 'def'

[FUN-vdck]

"Telusko" in telugu means "get yourself Know about topic"

[justliberty]

There is and has been a LOT of work done with Python in many fields that have little to do with AI. Most people using python do not do AI.

[ammu-kmyl]

sir how much tym does it take?to replace pytthon with mojo

[manju]

Everyone goes overboard with the ideas. However, investing time to get used to the recent timescale changes won't help you grow atleast one bit. On the contrary, honing your skills in atleast one of the system languages like, Rust, go, c and c++ together with high level languages help you widen your thought process and increase your confidence of solving potential problem. As a matter of fact, python will never ever be the most secured language. As a matter of fact, interpreted languages will always have downside. making use of all the cores effectively and program level os thread mapping will always cause problem in near future where the RAM sector is partially divided and potentially lead to the pagination errors. Learn the things, doing right but not amending right

[usercurious]

Not a superset, I've tried list comprehension as the first thing and it didn't work

[abdelkadergnichi]

Hi sir navine i want to ask did mojo programming language will be used for web development in the future ?