RAISING TERRA LUNA CLASSIC BURNS! 1.5% Vs 1.2%! WHO WILL WIN?

preview_player
Показать описание
Trade like a PRO! Gain Access to our trading indicators. 20% Off For LIFE

Access All Areas with our Patreon! Gain access to alpha drops! Enhance your skills!

Sign up with Margex today using our refferal link, No KYC required, Excellent leverage trading & much more!

Twitter Accounts

Channel Direct Contact
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Let's try the 1.5% and see how it goes

valentinodaxon
Автор

1.5 % on selling Lunc to the exchanges and 1.2% with buying Lunc at the exchanges.

Binance is not only helping us, but most definitely also themselves with their 2.1 Trillion Lunc.

wilcokalmeijer
Автор

This should not be about who will win but about what will help Lunc to recover. Who will win is a sign of selfishness. And it is not community focused

lazarusuchenna
Автор

I think we have to be more aggressive so people can see a significant burn every day. For example, if we see 126.92 B over 2 years, simple math says it would take more than 50 years. With Binance's help, if they stop... People will buy no mater the tax if the potential exist, utility take to much time and we will lose interest.

steliyanstoyanov
Автор

Let's do this 1.5 is a great idea 🎉🎉🎉

henhurm
Автор

What about the role of Citadel and is the situation comparable with the situation of Basis Cash, where DK was involved nicknamed Rick?

wilcokalmeijer
Автор

Where i can see project working On lunc?

Dominsmind
Автор

Sorry if ive missed it, but have we decided if the block chain will put or have put a bid in for station yet mate?

smallfry
Автор

Are they burning wlunc token holders tokens also? Or just wlunc token in a wallet with TFL?

Tavish
Автор

Let’s do 1.2 and send the lunc tax to a dex and buy and burn #USTC let’s send and repeg #USTC

rektcrypto
Автор

Thanks for the advice! Got NVDA88K, feeling bullish! 🚀

stevenaolani
Автор

I think 1.2 is best do to it was something like you were saying its been tested sadly it was taken out after 3 weeks it was lowered and we need or active set back and we might need to have a flexible proposal cost and maybe already a bit lower

michaelsmit
Автор

Let’s first go to 1.2% wait for some time probably months in order to see the positive impact which I believe it will then see if it’s good to switch to 1.5% or not.

For me I support 1.2% more than the 1.5%.

Yasirsama
Автор

Get the 1.2% on now and then work on the the dynamic tax it’s all good for the chain!

matthewpage
Автор

I think 1.2% would be easier to get through because as you say we have been at that percentage before and it’s harder to argue against not doing it. As some one has said utility will also help so wha is happening there? With a combination of the two we should start to progress more quickly with the burn and get more interest and people spreading the word with the excellent utility they find as well.

Martinc
Автор

Great info, great news Jay, Ty for the video. I only would like to know how validators steal the tokens when we allowd the re stake…I’ve being stolen for longtime, many validator thieves. They know the flaws of the system. That’s maybe why they don’t wanna be doxed…and never no one to show the facts and give some help. That’s defi, that’s the jungle? I’m for a main welcome page and for a help channel in #lunc. This chain had enough bad actors.

sparklinglumens
Автор

I have learnt a lot concerning crypto progress this time and will like to join in . I wish I can get a good mentorship❤

Elizabethbasci
Автор

Wonder if anyone has thought to merge Luna 2 and ustc into LUNC

FutureJ
Автор

If you were smart you'd admit you were wrong about jesusislords burn proposal. Join forces and implement thr burn, that's the only way.

DJRS
Автор

what happened to utility utility utility utility you said before burning wasnt good that it was going to fail now you have done a flip and now saying we got to burn. sounds like all your about it the views

danielpetersen