Postmodernism vs Great Narratives (1984) #philosophy #postmodernism

preview_player
Показать описание
A short clip of Gayatri Spivak from 1984 discussing post-structuralism as a skepticism regarding the grand récits (great narratives).

#philosophy #postmodernism #relativism
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

She is clearer in speech than in writing. I wish I heard her speeches more than read her books back in college.

dionysianapollomarx
Автор

everyone talking about her grammar no one understands what she is actually speaking about

aruji-sama
Автор

So it is 100% horseshit . Thanks for confirming

rackedbound
Автор

And here we are with the law of unintended consequences playing out.

MalachiCove
Автор

If meta-narratives are assumed, where is it stated that there is an end in view? This seems to be a pretty explicit statement for something that is inherently nebulous.

Postmodernism may a certain amount of validity but the more absolutist its adherents get the more contrary and paradoxical it becomes.

mark_tolver
Автор

Her preface to Of Grammatology was superb and clear. Idk what the critics in the comments are talking about.

cyberiadiscordia
Автор

When your parents don’t give you enough attention.

meio
Автор

It make sense that if you
define and end, other things are rejected.
The ends of this social justice, when it's equality
of equalness in all things and matters, human nature
Is left out.
So when its defined how
Social justice is to be
Achieved justice it's self is left out.
...

DonBailey-odde
Автор

Ok, but this precludes doing ANYTHING if it’s the only method you have. Ideologies and narratives are inherently specific, meaning inherently limiting.

matthewcaldwell
Автор

Ohh she is still alive currently 81 year old.

lordvenom
Автор

“…working within an understanding of what they cannot do.”
How would such a character view any narration? Certainly as something to undermine, never as something of value.
How would such a character write about his/her own intention: write their own narrative? Certainly not with a will to let it be understood by others. Their whole urge is destructive or negative: deconstructive. Literary nihilism.
Any book written by such a character is merely a warehouse of deception. They cannot reveal their intentions, not because they do not know it, but because it would undermine their intentions. Their intentions to avoid They are the apostles of the Antichrist whose project is not forgiveness of sins, but absence of sin. They are all atheists. Atheists whose one, fundamental, truth is “this is not God, that is not God”. Therefore there is no God. No creator, no narrator. Only causation, without any first cause or final effect. No morality, no beauty, no truth.

kallianpublico
Автор

Philosophy on teenager level... like most of postmodernism. It's like saying something that ryhmes and then claiming its poetry

jaykay
Автор

Narrative, the most overused word of the last 5 years.

davidap
Автор

I love her work where’s the full video

Karamazov
Автор

In the end, you'll get it in the end.

Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry
Автор

How I wish we still had the dislike option.

shankargopal
Автор

What was left out was "pronounciation" ☠️

rathankitar
Автор

“The sleek iridescent cuttlefish,
Does not in its benthic gloom
Emit so darkly obscuring an ink
As Spivak in a drawing room.”
(Apologies to TS Eliot)

carvakasatyasrutah
Автор

I find her account of post structuralism to be overly formulaic and transparent. The objective of poststructualism is to demonstrate the opacity of what is projected as transparent by showing how all human assertions of fact, rationality and truth take two things for granted: 1) Being is Being: 2) Language affects a direct relation between Thought and Being.

charliebridges
Автор

গায়ত্রী এক ক্ষণজন্মা বাঙালি। তার বক্তব্য পরিস্কার। পরনের শাড়ি ও ব্লাউজও পশ্চিমা পোশাক কালচারের মাঝে এক আত্মবিশ্বাসী বক্তব্য তুলে ধরেছে।

দীর্ঘজীবী হোন, গায়ত্রী।

zahid