OpenAI o1: ChatGPT Supercharged!

preview_player
Показать описание

📝OpenAI o1 preview:

📝 My paper on simulations that look almost like reality is available for free here:

Or this is the orig. Nature Physics link with clickable citations:

🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:
Alex Balfanz, Alex Haro, B Shang, Benji Rabhan, Gaston Ingaramo, Gordon Child, John Le, Juan Benet, Kyle Davis, Loyal Alchemist, Lukas Biewald, Martin, Michael Albrecht, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Taras Bobrovytsky, Ted Johnson, Thomas Krcmar, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi.

#openai #o1
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Going to need some help holding on to my papers with this one, this is cool!

holographic_red
Автор

"Do you want to work with someone that read all the books but can never apply that knowledge?" Wow. You didn't have to call me out like that.

Valzack
Автор

After 7.5 million years of thinking.The answer is 42.

disconnect
Автор

Tried the new model. I gave it instruction to write paragraph on some set of constraints. with slower thinking, it actually results in better response. What a time to be alive!

GierlangBhaktiPutra
Автор

Back in my days we had only two 'r's in a word 'strawberry'

cmb
Автор

This is huge; I wouldn't think this could happen so soon!
And remember the first law of papers, two more papers down the line 👀

berghwilliam
Автор

Tried today with coding a Unreal engine 5 plugin. This version is finally able to grab the context and maintain the focus without just repeating the same mistakes.🎉

wormjuice
Автор

Oooooh. So about a week ago I got the usual response1/response2 “which is better” when using GPT 4o, except this time there was a disclaimer saying “you are testing a new model which takes more time to think, please be patient while the response loads” and I guess this was the new model they were alpha testing to premium users? Pretty cool if you ask me

And yes, I did notice one of the results was significantly better so I assume it was this o1 model, and the other was standard 4o response. What a time to be alive!

EVILBUNNY
Автор

Reasoning is the key. They are on the right path.

CodexPermutatio
Автор

I always thought that GPT knew too much for having such a small brain.

This is a total notch up. What a time to be alive!

galvinvoltag
Автор

To test it out I played tic tac toe against it, GPT-4o was constantly losing and made illogical moves, now against o1-preview, I haven't won yet.

sevir
Автор

I asked o1 how many "R's" were in "strawberry, " and it answered correctly (3). I then asked it where the R's were, and it told me there was one in the fourth position 😭

It's good, but certainly not perfect yet!

oshotz
Автор

Tried it yesterday. It solved a tricky probability question all of the previous versions got wrong consistently, even after multiple hints. It needed one clarification this time, but then got it right.

Bmmhable
Автор

The smartest people out there just got an upgrade.

ClockworkDave
Автор

First things first, we should ask it to prove the Riemann Hypothesis.

Tekay
Автор

The "There are 3 Rs in strawberry" freakin' got me

Limits
Автор

The potential of o1 to excel in fields like genetics and quantum physics is truly groundbreaking. The future of AI-assisted research looks incredibly promising!

AdvantestInc
Автор

I asked it to make a simple ascii roguelike game in C for the terminal, where the entity data is kept in JSON files. It seriously even wrote Python code to generate a C file from the JSON data. Compiled with no errors, first try. Graphics and keyboard input both work. Updating the code to add enemies, loot and treasure introduced a bug. Still, I can't believe how good this model is.

UliTroyo
Автор

I was playing around with this and was able to generate a clone of Atari's classic "Centipede" via HTML and Javascript in a single prompt.

That said, I did need to run through about 30 more iterations to get it where I was satisfied with the gameplay, the initial version was functional, but somewhat one-dimensional in terms of gameplay.

I just used Emojis instead of generating any sprite sheets (works well enough for a game like this), and used Suno to generate a 4-bit synth audio loop for background music.

Overall, I could have written this game by hand in about 2 hours.
The time spent with ChatGPT was actually about 3 hours, lol. But, ChatGPT allowed me to go through many more iterations and experiment with features much more quickly, without compromising on the quality. So for the time spent, I think I came out with a much more polished game than if I had manually coded it in the same amount of time.

Arkryal
Автор

What a GPT time to be supercharged alive! 🎉

test-uyvc