What Mueller’s Investigation Could Mean for President Trump | NYT News

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, will likely reach one of two conclusions about the president: Either there is evidence that he broke the law, or there is not. Mike Schmidt, a New York Times reporter, explains the possible outcomes.

More from The New York Times Video:

----------

Whether it's reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It's all the news that's fit to watch.

[glershnern]

wow. i actually understand now.
pictures, arrows and slow talking make all the difference to my stupid brain

[ylprogramdotorg]

Well, how did this all work out for ya? You won a prize on something that was essentially fiction.

[levimcgowan]

Well well well hasn't this aged badly 😆. I have an over supply of liberal tears that I desperately need to offload. Discounts of up to 70%

[katden]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 my goodness! What will happen when they come back and say they found nothing???? Forgot to bring that part up huh? 😂

[roberthopgood]

A 3rd options would be to say there is not enough evidence to take to a trial

[spacitron]

So in short when you're rich not only does the law not apply to you, you get prized for braking it and make yourself even more untouchable in the process.

[claudiag]

brilliant - for an outsider this helps to understand the process with regards to the investigation.

[rmir]

Well, Mueller did not even do that. There was nothing to trigger anything with. Never were.

[Rendezvous]

Hey! Dont spoil the surprise! Lock him up lock him up ! Subpoena his taxes

[antonresurreccion]

In Asia a lot people are ok with Trump. He's easy to manipulate and adopts an isolationist stance. It does make U.S. influence and power weaker overseas and that gives a lot of opportunity for other players to take advantage. E.g. China and India are the foremost countries around here that's really taking advantage in this lull of American influence and power.

[jsmcguireIII]

What about the New York Southern District Court?

[noomwa]

THANK YOU for making this so granular.

[kristinpowell]

To indict the president is a policy not a law.

[MadTopHat]

0:22 is possibly the best meme picture caption in history. Simply incredible. Gotta hang that thing up with the other prizes and awards for their I mean, journalism.

[larryc]

I hope this wholesale disinformation by these corrupt media companies and publications gets punished.

[larrybetancourt]

Indict them all our country needs help not Trump

[totalt]

If prez perv had any sense of shame, (ha!), he would resign yesterday.

[digital]

Or, the report could find that Trump committed no crimes and the report remains confidential and the witch hunt ends.

[gigisinclair]

Trump may be indicted if Rosenstein agrees.

[rexablett]

I get that what you’re saying matters, but my God! Talk about a charisma vacuum?! Is this seriously the best presenter the NYT could get??