SAS Tutorial | Machine Learning Magic Tricks Using SAS

preview_player
Показать описание
Learn how to turn exploratory models into a machine learning pipeline through the three magic tricks that SAS’ Cat Truxillo waves with her SAS Visual Analytics and SAS Model Studio wands. In the SAS How To Tutorial, Cat takes you through a “bird strike” example to show how to explain your variables, create an automated predictive model, and put it into a pipeline that can be deployed for scoring. She also explains that at times you may wish to add your own model to compare with the others to find your champion.

Download the data

Chapters
0:00 – Intro
0:54 – Learn about the sample bird strike data set
1:40 – Demo in SAS Visual Analytics and SAS Model Studio
2:38 – Magic trick #1: Explain your variables
5:27 – Magic trick #2: Create your machine learning model
8:47 – Magic trick #3 - Create your pipeline

Learn more about SAS Software

SUBSCRIBE TO THE SAS USERS YOUTUBE CHANNEL #SASUsers #LearnSAS

ABOUT SAS
SAS is a trusted analytics powerhouse for organizations seeking immediate value from their data. A deep bench of analytics solutions and broad industry knowledge keep our customers coming back and feeling confident. With SAS®, you can discover insights from your data and make sense of it all. Identify what’s working and fix what isn’t. Make more intelligent decisions. And drive relevant change.

CONNECT WITH SAS
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Hi Cat. Great to "see" you. Miss live meetings, but this was a good substitute. The modeling was awesome!

roncody
Автор

Cat is back! Great to see you, Cat! Terrific video (as usual)! Thank you! By the way, I hope that SAS Institute stays on its own FOREVER. No merges, please!

Zane_Zaminsky
Автор

Great video, thank you! In the explain your variables section what methodology is being used to explain the damage? Is SAS fitting a logistic regression then converting log odds to report probabilities in certain scenarios?

LaSupp
Автор

I'm not sure what precisely is magic here, but I found the walkthrough of the ML process to be coherent and helpful. I'm also curious about the decision to use the flight phase in the model. All that really tells us is that damage is more likely when the plane is in the air. This is not a groundbreaking insight. Should that variable therefore be restricted to those for which the plane is in the air?

michaeltuchman
Автор

This is amazing, Cat. Thanks. You asked what else we would like to see? How about risk adjusted scoring?

rogerward
visit shbcf.ru