Sunk Cost Fallacy Explained 🤯

Sunk Cost Fallacy Explained 🤯

🙌 H E L P F U L L I N K S 🙌

#shorts #humphreytalks

📲SOCIALS:

😺 WHO AM I: I am not a cat. My name is Humphrey Yang, I've built multiple businesses and am passionate about Personal Finance, Investing, among other things! If you're trying to build a solid foundation of financial literacy, learn to invest, or become financially free - then I'm here for you!

PS: I am not a Financial Advisor, any investment commentary are my opinions only. Some of the links in this description are affiliate links that I do receive a commission for.

[flintdfg]

I mean if he eats the burger, he might not like it but he'll still have eaten, and will not be hungry or have to buy another meal, so that's not sunk cost, it's just common sense

[TheSniperMAJOR]

In case of the movie I get it, but with the burger you just paid a certain amount for the calories, so the cost of staying alive that day goes up if you don't eat that burger.

[jacksonwakefield]

In the movie situation, can’t you change movies tickets for another as long as you watched less than 30 minutes of it

[diabloakland]

You can get a refund if you leave before 30 minutes! Singed a veteran cinema worker

[jasperreyes]

Food is never a sunk cost... Unless you throw it in the bin after taking a single bite and not liking it... It's better to just give it to a hungry homeless dude in that case...

[zolv]

An example with a burger is not a sunk cost fallacy. Even if it tastes awful, eating it gives me a lot o nutritients which is worth eat it.