Understanding NaN in JavaScript: How to Properly Use reduce()

Discover why `reduce()` in JavaScript returns `NaN` and learn how to fix it with proper return statements.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Console log in Reduce() returning NaN

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding NaN in JavaScript: How to Properly Use reduce()

When working with JavaScript, it's common to encounter issues that can be frustrating and perplexing. One such issue arises when using the reduce() method. Have you ever found yourself logging results to the console only to discover it's returning NaN (Not-a-Number) instead of the expected numerical output? In this post, we'll dive into a specific example that illustrates this problem and discuss how to effectively solve it.

The Problem: Console Log in reduce() Returns NaN

Imagine you have a function that sums the lengths of all words in a string, split by spaces. You might set it up like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Explanation: Why Are You Getting NaN?

The root of this problem lies in how the reduce() method operates. The first argument (a) in the callback function represents the accumulated value from all prior iterations, while the second argument (b) represents the current item being processed in the array.

On the first iteration, a is initialized to 0 (the value you provided) and b is the length of the first word.

However, the issue arises because you are not returning the result from the callback function. As a result:

In the first call, although you log a valid number, you fail to return it, causing the accumulation of undefined for the next iterations.

Thus, on the second call, you're essentially calculating undefined + <number>, which mathematically results in NaN. This continues for all subsequent iterations.

The Solution: Returning Values in Your Callback

To fix this problem, you need to ensure that each iteration of the reduce() function properly returns the computed value for the next iteration to use. Here's how to adjust your function:

Step 1: Ensure Proper Return

Incorporate a return statement within your callback function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Simplify with Implicit Return

For a more streamlined version, you can remove the curly braces and use an implicit return. This keeps your code concise while maintaining clarity:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By understanding the millisecond mechanics of reduce() and ensuring that you always return a value from your callback function, you can avoid unexpected results like NaN. With the corrected code, you will get the intended total of the lengths of all words in the string. Happy coding!