Are these undeniable historical facts about Jesus?

#maklelan2253

[oilfieldtrash]

State a claim. Declare that the claim is an undeniable fact. Win the argument.

[therongjr]

"He keeps using those words. I do not think they mean what he thinks they mean." 🤺

[thedude]

The guy is just straight up making content for believers.

[CB]

If Peter and Thomas who spent time with Jesus both denied and doubted Jesus respectively, and that Paul needed a vision to be convinced, what chance do we humans 2000 years into the future have?

[XarXXon]

For the Nth time, arguments aren't evidence. Good work as usual Dr Dan.

[dwightdhansen]

No facts were harmed in the making of the creator's video.

[JosephNobles]

The members of the Heaven's Gate community were willing to die for their beliefs that they would be taken aboard the spacecraft hiding in the Hale-Bopp comet.

[georgeheingartner]

I enjoyed this video. Undeniable historical fact.

[nerfzombie]

This guy doesn't understand the definitions of "undeniable, " "historical, " or "facts." What a clown!!

[troyroberts]

Dan, just let me say that your daily videos are some of the highlights of my day.

[seekerhonest]

Thank you Dan for all your ACCURATE and IMPORTANT WORK here.
Most people wouldnt even have the time to investigate about all those claimed "facts" from all those self-declared apologetics in the net.

[Joshua.-]

Dan McClellan you have helped me become an agnostic and unbeliever better than any human living, thank you for that.

[gregjennings]

The fit being The Punisher was so appropriate for this video.

[christophersandford]

Ive been wanting to read Dale Allison's book but not got round to it.

For the YouTube crowd Paulogia's minimal witnesses hypothesis is a great summary of how a plausible naturalistic explanation can be made that accounts for the facts of the early speed of Christianity. Bearing in mind the purpose is not to say what did happen but to demonstrate how saying the "most likely" explanation being the resurrection is not based on anything more than preference.

[hughb]

Alot of us who were Christians and deconverted to Atheism or Agnosticism love Dan’s channel because for the first time in decades without end we’re finally getting answers to questions we asked for many years while in the faith. Apologists had more to do with my deconversion than any Atheist.

[theoutspokenhumanist]

I have recently debated someone who made the very same assertions. His basic premise was that the consensus of biblical scholars know these things to be true. I explained the difference between knowledge and belief and that scholars do not know these things, even if some of them might be convinced of them. I also had to make it clear that the very existence of a consensus tells us that we are not dealing with facts. If something has been established as a fact, using verifiable evidence, no consensus opinion is required.
Needless to say, the debate did not end with agreement. They never do.

[Prom]

Millions of Scandinavians were willing to die to enter Valhalla. Odin exists, undeniable historical fact.

[scienceexplains]

Paulogia also has some good videos on Habermas’ position and related issues.

[TurtleFalcon]

Post-bereavement hallucination is common. There was a king of Portugal killed in Morocco that fits that description. Or, of course, Elvis.

[WhichDoctor]

im dyslexic and currently recovering from a migraine, so read the title as "Are these unreliable historical facts about Jesus?". Turns out my messed up brain got it right after all!