Strange Binary Star System that SHOULD NOT EXIST!?

Strange Binary Star System that SHOULD NOT EXIST!?

About 450 light years from Earth Astronomers have found one of the strangest star systems ever. Most binary systems consist of one main star and a companion. This system appears to be a brown dwarf with another planet orbiting it. The brown dwarf sits in the lowest end of possible brown dwarf sizes. It's companion is a giant sized planet that sits so far from the star that it should almost not orbit it. How could such a system even form? Let's examine what is going on with this system

Please consider supporting this channel through:

Follow me on:

References:

#electricuniverse #plasmauniverse #seethepattern

[ulyssesk]

I really appreciate that you work in more "geographic" topics compared, to other eu channels, as well as your computer models. This makes it more easy to visualize the concepts.

[shockwave]

ty gareth, , , good one again, , , and all stars and planets are created in a z-pinch condition im sure of that !!

[Norbert-ykjy]

Scalability is one of the principles of Plasma Cosmology, but when it comes to the question "how was the universe created?", plasma cosmologists reply that it's been here forever. If stars and planets are made by the z-pinch, then why can't this be scaled up and applied to the whole universe?

[Jollyprez]

I'm sorry, but modern astronomy's "observations" are completely bogus. Maybe some old-timers here can remember having cable TV and how they scrambled channels you weren't subscribed-to. Basically, they used an analog distortion to prevent the tv from syncing on the signal, so all you got was distorted shapes and colors that kinda-sorta changed with the audio. Your brain had to fill-in what was actually visible, but without the audio -that was impossible These "scientists" looking at "very far-away objects" are getting 2% of the information they need, via who knows how many distortions and impediments along the way, and making inferences based upon them. Like that "picture of a black hole" a few years ago. It was a darker blob, that had been through so many filters and tweaks, that it was unrecognizable from the original capture. It's all nonsense.

[Snailmailtrucker]

You'll be going over 10, 000 subscribers this week !
Good stuff ! Liked/Subscribed !

[kesterkonnorson]

In truth, we do not know what we are looking at. We are assuming that all objects in our field of view correspond to what we have in our solar system. Thanks for keeping us up to date on the latest observations.

[daviddrew]

Factoring in Electromagnetism begins to answer many of the mysteries that have required exotic hypotheticals and mathmagics up until now.

[runs_through_the_forest]

happy i am, to see, you are still very brave and curious, truth seekers ahoi 😁

[nobigbang]

It seems the more they discover the deeper they dig up the grave for the standard model.

[loveleyday]

The catchy name: CFHTWIROPH98 - Couldn't Find Hubble's Telescope, Was I Really On Pot? - Hector, '98.

[waitwhat]

Damn. Observation data confounds astrophysicists' theory again! They require more MONEY to investigate. lol

[humbleeagle]

Since a Birkeland current is a follow of charged particles in space, can we build a spaceship, give it a charge, and ride the current through space? How fast could we move?

[stevenwhite]

What nobody seems to be commenting on is that planets are shining like stars…. So how many other stars are actually just planets….

[curtisharrison]

The only reason I struggle so hard with the electric universe model is when I see a dwarf start circling a much larger star how come it doesn't connect to the same filament. Or say in systems where their are 5 stars so close to each other that it 1 in 1 trillion they would connected to different filaments yet some are massive some are and their is order to their sizes it's completely.

[KaliFissure]

Are People applying a relativistic curves on the apparent visual space between those objects? We need to remember that in theory, you can never even GET TO the surface of an event horizon because space is curved totally 90° to our usual perception of it. Visual arc component is a terrible way to measure distances in these situations unless you impinge/account for a significant additional LOCAL to the objects REAL distance.

[humanitech]

Although interesting, ..and I don't want to be disrespectful, but I do wish we would just focus on more localised things. Things that we can accurately see, record, test and speculate upon... rather than gather loads and loads of fuzzy confusing data from distant things, that cannot be accurately researched using currently good but constrained technology - to any great depth or detail.

Especially as I think we still have a great deal to learn about (and from) our own sun, solar system and the bodies within and then beyond to other observable places in our galaxy.

As I'm sure that we are sometimes going round in ever more confusing theoretical circles..in trying to answer things with such crude and questionable data.

Perhaps like eager children we are simply missing some key important things and relevent data here around us ..right on our doorstep so to speak... that in turn might help us move forwards in a more progressive way ....technically and scientifically....just a thought.

[yb]

Get off Twatter and Fbook. There are other better platforms available ie. GAB.

[rubenanthonymartinez]

Strange but true, according to the laws of thermodynamics, none of these systems ought to exist. In fact the entire universe, as organized, should not exist, which gives evidence of what Fred Hoyle called a superintellect, which is defined as superintelligence; a agent that possesses intelligence and power exceeding any conceivable creature, human or otherwise. This "Superintelligence" is also referred to as the creator, also known as God. This God, as in the Hebrew/ Christian tradition, carries the *name Jehovah.*

[schmeegil]

Have you been outside and watched the phases of the moon recently?

[JamesWebbKilledTheBigBangStars]

How...What's the word?...Baffling? Shocking? Puzzling? We need new physics?