Fujifilm GFX50S II Hands On | Worth The Hype?!

preview_player
Показать описание
The Fujifilm GFX 50SII aims to disrupt the full-frame camera market by bringing medium format to the masses at a price point never seen before in a digital medium format camera.

0:00 - Introduction
1:32 - Design & Features
7:15 - Price Analysis
8:20 - Is 50 Megapixels Enough?
9:20 - Performance
11:00 - Is It Worth Upgrading From A Full-Frame?
11:49 - What Could Have Been Better?
12:26 - How Good Is The Kit Lens?
15:45 - Image Test & Comparison
17:15 - Our Thoughts & Conclusions

This video is shot with the Canon EOS R5

Geek Culture is supported by:

#FujiFilm #FujiGFX #MediumFormat
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Finally a reflective assessment and discussion on the latest GFX-cameras. This is really one of the rare and informative videos on the topic out there asides the ton of shallow review videos. Thank you!

goNorth
Автор

Thanks for the wonderful review. Now I'm interested in the GFX50 II. Despite the older sensor, I love the colours on the GFX.

fotonutzz
Автор

Great review! I have 2 x GFX50s's and love them for my more sedentary fashion shoots. Perfect AF in single AF mode. Never miss a shot.

BenjaminKanarek
Автор

A very good review that provides honest opinions. If you pay more you usually get more. Nevertheless, my impression from this review (and a few others!) is that the 50SII with the 35 - 70 lens is capable of producing fantastic photos and therefore is worth the money. I've used med format in the film era and its image quality was superior to 35mm (FF). I sense that still holds. Yes the two formats have their differences and advantages. I love FF but I'm attracted to this Fuji 50sII/35 - 70 combo. It's an excellent starting point and much more if I was just to add one more lens.

JackieSemple
Автор

Hi there! Regarding AF, is the fast AF on the GFX50R the same as the on in the GFX50S2 ?
I ask the question because I just got a 50R to start with and I saw that there is the option of fast AF. Maybe included in the firmware update of the 50R

DidierMOULINPhotography
Автор

My decision would be geared towards better high iso performance and mainly the difference in dynamic range . How do the two of them compare in those parameters? Thanks for the video

ivanlupi
Автор

As a FujiFilm fanboy, I rented one to see what the fuss was all about… but no, it’s not a “balanced” camera for enough scenarios at the asking price, even used today at $2000 — it’s too much money. Specialist device, for professionals who know what they need and will use the camera to make money.

MikeLikesChannel
Автор

To be honest, if Fujifilm don’t want this camera and lens to be a success then this bloke’s doing a great job…. Staggered he’s a Fujifilm ambassador 😮

chloescanlon
Автор

I'm okay with phase detect AF because it's usually super accurate for slow shooting. What is a hurdle for me though, is the lack of decent video (only FHD at 8-bit 4:2:0 on this I believe). I'm not for a moment saying that a larger format sensor camera should be judged by its video, but it is really convenient to have both solutions in one camera (and one case of lenses) and 4K is really beneficial even when delivering something in FHD. I'm mostly a hobbyist with the occasional paid work, and while I love taking stills, I also love being able to flick it to video and getting something decent. So $2k more for better autofocus, better video (rez and bitdepth) and double the stills resolution is worth considering in my humble opinion. Basically, if I buy a GFX50sii I'll still be carrying my XT3 and its lenses with me everywhere I go. If I could afford a GFX100s, I could probably sell my XT3 and XF lenses to fund the difference, though I would miss the slow-mo capabilities.

ruaangrobler
Автор

As early as possible....I love FUji cameras

de-graftasafo-adjei
Автор

personally, i prefer the sensor of the 50 over the 100.

MarcSR
Автор

That 50mp sensor is a lot older than 4 years btw. What I want is a big pixel modern 60mp BSI sensor, with phase detect AF, 4K video ability (Nothing amazing, but just so we have it in a pinch), a 5.76 million dot EVF, a CF Express card slot, and the X-Processor 5 out of the X-H2. The EVF, CF express slot, and processor shouldn't be too hard, it already comes in the $2000 X-H2. This with the kit lens should be $4K, otherwise the FF market is so hot on the GFX's tail, it won't be relevant soon. FF already has 60mp in several cameras, the small GFX has to at least match the res, and up the pixel size, otherwise it won't be competitive. The 100mp model needs to go up in res even more soon, with similar processor and EVF upgrades. Either that, or give it the world's first MF stacked sensor and break the internet. That might pair well with the new 300mm GF lens patent. ;)

Clint_the_Audio-Photo_Guy
Автор

Thanks a lot for this video.it’s format is very good. Is the 50SII relevant? Well, with its kit lens I think it’s a marketing operation to make people enter the medium format world but the result is not even as good as a powerful crop sensor camera with a modern sensor and a good lens for 1/4 of the price.
I think this kit lens should not even exist. It will only create frustration to people who will buy it. The 50sII is certainly relevant with the line of high level lenses (80, 110, 120, 250) thanks to its Ibis but the lack of phase detection and 16 bits make it less interesting for professional.
Looking at the limitation of my SL2 (contrast detect only) I will certainly take the 100s with phase detection and not make the same error I did with the L mount

DidierMOULINPhotography
Автор

I think it's pretty clear focus was missed on the upper half of the figure for the 50s shots

OlDan-pn
Автор

I agree that the wife's kitchen scale is always correct!

alwinkok
Автор

Don’t need 100 but need AF. Too bad love the body.

DonaldHawk
Автор

I had one for a short while. Not impressed at all. It didn't do anything well at all IMHO

RichardsModellingAdventures
Автор

Fuji took their sister to the prom with the 50 ii. Other than price point, it has not much to offer. 90% of the FF market has better features and image quality. Antiquated sensor and AF. I contemplated the purchase but if anyone is considering it, your money is Much..Much better spent on an A1 or R5. Back to the drawing board Fuji.

RichardJPhotog
welcome to shbcf.ru