Thinking in Systems, Key Ideas (Ch. 1)

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, I go through the key ideas in Ch. 1 of Donella H. Meadows' book, Thinking in Systems. I go through key ideas such as the definition of a system, feedback loops, stock & flow, and elements/connectors/purposes.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Ashley, I watched the series and I'd like to compliment you on the effective summary of this important work in systems thinking. It could really bring humanity to a different level if only it were widely taught in the general curriculum, rather than in specialized system dynamics tracks.

strategyentropy
Автор

As an engineer, I loved the book. I think the shifts (changing stock gradually) that only appear 2-3 years later are akin to trends.

andile
Автор

Just finished the first chapter last night. Great overview of the material, really helpful for integrating it.

tropestar
Автор

A previous job I had entailed learning electronic systems that are full of connections, stocks, and flows. Once I understood how to read a circuit diagram I could diagnose and fix the problem. I believe thinking in systems is a tool that can lead to understanding and problem-solving. My issue is how to diagram a system.

thomasjones
Автор

Great video! A subject that is not common for economists but explained by one is really useful (I am an economist either).

rodrigomiyamoto
Автор

Very interesting. I really look forward to seeing your lectures on other books.

governancesection
Автор

I was just about to start this audiobook! Thank you for the breakdown.

BC-huyq
Автор

Just came across your channel. Really enjoyed this video! You do a great job of explaining systems thinking.

blackviking
Автор

This is great! I have Donna's book and tried reading it some time ago, but I got bogged down in just the first chapter. I'm going to watch this series and have another go at it.

graytonw
Автор

You are really talented my friend 🤗 you have my full support 😁 thank you for sharing this amazing video👌👍👌👍✨

lmpmotivation
Автор

Great channel! Loving the videos. I will continue to watch them. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

thecraftofmemory
Автор

What a great video. How do you mic yourself up so that your voice is still clear when you turn to the whiteboard?

jeremynguyen
Автор

When the Soviet Union and China introduced capitalism, the former opted to change the system instantly, while the latter, opted to gradually change the system.

I think it's a very interesting observation that some systems can't just instantly change, like the bathtub analogy.

werthersoriginal
Автор

In Archimate: Elements = Active Structures, Connectors = relationships, passive objects. Purposes = Objectives, Outcomes, Functions ... potentially!?

NPC--
Автор

I just stumbled across your channel and I am trying to self learn economics. Where should I start and what videos do you recommend to watch?

hohljdn
Автор

So what's the purpose of the universe?

Serious question. Specifically, why space and time, which then seem to lead to scarcity of resources and therefore competition and therefore exploitation...?

What is the "more" that is above and beyond the sum of all the parts of the universe??

davidchou
Автор

Is it actually the case that if we replace all elements of the system, the system will survive?
Suppose, we bring person x to school y and person x is new to school y, and there is person z who h had been in school y for a long time, now that z can teach x about school's rules, but now suppose we eliminated all persons who had been in school y and then bring x to school y, and suupose that there's no books or articles which are in school y and can tell anything to x about school y rules, and suppose also that x can't go outside school y, now can x know anything about school y rules? No, if the one who did the replacement didn't teach him (teach x) or tell him.

ahmedbellankas
Автор

Most and fastest changes happen during disasters; fast and not with much mercy for what the state of the system is. I have a hard time fitting this fact in author's model. Undoubtedly some changes happen following this model, but considering the jump we had during major disasters like wold wars or COVID-19 world wide infection, those changes seems marginal.
I believe in many system her model is valid, however it's not easy to consider it as a valid strategy or valid set of expected events, in compression.

ArashArfaee
Автор

U remind me of that cute assistant girl from American psycho!

simpleman
Автор

none of this is particularly profound or new to me i've always have systematic thinking

togo