Live NASA Media Briefing on UFOs and Discussion

NASA media briefing at the agency’s headquarters in Washington to discuss the findings from an unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) independent study team it commissioned in 2022. About 30 minutes before the briefing, the agency will publish the team’s full report online, which aims to inform NASA on what possible data could be collected in the future to shed light on the nature and origin of UAP / UFOs.

00:00 - Pre-Commentary
06:58 - Bill Nelson
16:21 - Nicola Fox
19:40 - Daniel Evans
22:25 - David Spergel
27:00 - Q. James Fox - Is There a Plan to Tell the Public it’s ET
30:07 - Q. Reuters - Name of UAP Researcher Director
31:04 - Q. British News - UFOs and Removing the Stigma
35:11 - Q. BBC News - How are you Removing the Stigma, and AI
38:36 - Q. Associated Press - Being Bombarded by Questions and Comments
41:27 - Q. Sky News London - UAP Team Budget
48:03 - Q. Space News - Briefing Report
49:00 - Q. BBC News Digital - MX UFO Hearing and the Alien Bodies
50:34 - Q. Defense Scoop - Media Actions, and the DOD Reports
54:20 - Q. Danish News Berlingske - Is the Government Being Transparent?
56:25 - Q. ABC News - Using AI
01:00:45 - Q. Financial Times - Crowdsourcing
01:03:08 - Q. News Nation - Privacy or Transparency ?
01:06:06 - Post Commentary

Live NASA Media Briefing on UFOs

Not LIVE: US House hearing on UFOs, But NASA to release report on UAPs | NewsNation Now, But Have We Made Contact With Extra Terrestrials? | Alien Documentary | Spark, But Ancient Aliens: NASA’s Untold Extraterrestrial Encounter (Season 4), But The Proof Is Out There: UFO Crash Spotted in NASA Photo (Season 3), But Apollo 11’s ‘third astronaut’ reveals secrets from dark side of the moon | 60 Minutes Australia, But Top Secret UFO Nasa Tapes, But New! NASA UFO - Leaked Moon images and video!, But We decoded NASA’s messages to aliens by hand, But EXCLUSIVE: Buzz Aldrin Confirms UFO Sighting in Syfy's 'Aliens on the Moon', But UFO NASA's unexplained tether overload incident, But NASA holds public address about UFO sightings, or any other video like GOP Oversight, NewsNation, HISTORY, 60 Minutes Australia, Strangesightings, Viral Quickies, Verge Science, Entertainment Tonight, Rush NZ, xXPersianxAlienXx, The Australian, would make. This is a video where Cristina Gomez (aka CristinaG) presents Live NASA Media Briefing on UFOs and Discussion!

#nasa
#ufo
#ufos
#uap

[CristinaG]

🥰 *LEAVE ME A COMMENT* ➔ *Let me know in the comments what you thought of the NASA UAP Media Briefing, and your favorite questions / answers*

[stevenecarrier]

I think I’ve officially given up on the US and anything regarding UAP. It’s embarrassing. Each hearing is “we do transparency” and “we don’t know” and “thank you for your hard work” and “it’s important” this is just ridiculous. They can pack it up and go home, the rest of us have got it covered.

[against-thecurrent]

NASA says, "we are going to be completely transparent, " and in the next question answered they say "we are not telling you who we appointed for this position or how much we are spending." Complete non-transparency and no accountability. BS. Complete waste of time.

[AVNetworkGuy]

They didn't disappoint in disappointing us at least

[TheHighlanderprime]

That was a horrible and incompetent display by NASA.

[UFONarrative]

Thank you, Christine, for presenting this to us. NASA had a chance to finally be transparent, honest and humble concerning this topic but instead we were presented with condescending arrogance and hubris. Such a disappointment. Ironically, the canned, dismissive answers to people's questions revealed the lack of authenticity and transparency of its very panelists. It's healthy to be skeptical about any topic - and certainly this one - and I completely understand the importance of presenting it within a scientific framework; however, the pendulum swung to one side, heavily. Why not be truly transparent and admit that indeed, many of these sightings can be explained by scientific observation but there are some that fall outside of this and the panel would be devoting further efforts to understand them. Sadly, it appears that the true purpose of this panel is to simply explain away such potentially profound discoveries through careless dismissiveness. I did have hopes for this but am truly saddened by NASA's apparent disregard for scientific curiosity concerning the mysteries of this vast universe. Once again, the Brookings Report rears its ugly head. Another tremendous disappointment.

[jameshatfield]

I had to laugh when they said how transparent they were going to be and the 2nd question asked them was how much money is allocated to the program and who is running it . Their answer to both was " We cant tell you that". 😂😂😂

[carlosbadiavillaseca]

You're right, Cristina. They were condescending, even disparaging (as when referring to David Grusch). Lots of smirks (oh, how smart we all are here at NASA). It was embarrassing, to say the least. And I felt they were talking to us, the public, like we are schmucks. Strongly disappointed.

[myshkakozlovski]

This is like when your kids ask you “Mom? Dad? What were you doing in bed last night? What was all of that noise” and Mom and Dad respond “oh, that was nothing, honey, we were just doing some jumping jacks and push-ups before we went to sleep”.

[Noname]

Jesús Christ, that first woman talked to everyone like we’re all kindergartners …that was so cringe

[yvonnepaulovicqueen]

thank you Cristina. Long before NASA, there was my little sister, my baby brother and my self. Bucks County Pennsylvania circa 1954.
During hot summer nights us kids would sleep out in the front yard to keep cool while sleeping.
During some of those nights we would watch these beautiful lights, in the form of flying saucers dance in the ski's around us. It was very exciting to watch and we were never frightened. The only time we were frightened was when Johnsville naval air station would send very low flying jet fighters roaring over the tree tops to investigate what was seen on radar. Some times after the jets were gone the lights would return. it was not a big deal to see them. We believed!

[rebelred]

This hearing was exactly what we've come to expect from our government agencies, which is why half of us have stopped listening. They get their information about the latest developments in the field from Twitter and watching the news. Not exactly shocked to hear this.

[aviaja]

Well, that was a disappointing opening!
For all you witnesses out there, we know there is visitors right now.
NASA just toldl us we are stupid and unreliable.
That is a personal attack!
Game on!

[tonyascott]

The Mexico officials HAVE made public the data from prestigious scientific studies and HAVE invited the scientific community to evaluate the specimens.

[kezan]

For those that didn't read the report...The very last page of the report said "there is no reason to conclude" that extra-terrestrial sources are behind the hundreds of UAP sightings Nasa has investigated.

"However... those objects must have travelled through our solar system to get here, " the report said.

[benegeserit]

Harking back to that excellent reveal from Mexico yesterday about the alien corpses, I’ve been checking a few major news services. As per usual, where I live in Australia, our government broadcaster, the ABC, hasn’t mentioned it and they didn’t mention the USA senate hearing into UAP’s. Our country is well and truly stitched up as a vassal state for the USA so no surprises really. Yesterday’s reveal kind of really threw me a bit in a good way. Like, it’s real!! Alien/non-human life is real! Thanks for streaming it Cristina.

[MattBramon]

We should all honestly expect this from NASA at this point and not look to them for any information. If we can't even get Grusch to speak to our members of Congress in a SCIF, why would we expect NASA to provide us with anything? The faster we can come to the conclusion that NASA is not to be the source to listen to regarding this issue, the better.

[F.R.E.E.]

I didn't see the whole thing, but I did see the end to get some feedback from Christina, was not surprised to hear her discription.😍😍Thanks, appreciate you.

[Jeremyak]

Their attitudes are perfectly in keeping with how they view the public, as children.

[paddedcave]

Wow Cristina, it's crazy to me that Bill Nelson responded to the David Grusch question by what he saw on the nightly news, more or less saying he never watched the hearing. Him not watching the hearing is crazy to me. These groups might be more disconnected than we think....