Zang vs Nim - Fizz-buzz to 25,000 - Performance test

In this comparison video, I compare Nim, a statically typed compiled language (which is better then zang, ngl im not taking on nim, just a comparison) with zang, a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
LINKS:

[afjelidfjssaf]

Dishonest comparison... use the release flag and other optimized flags and Nim would be 10x faster

[janAkaliKilo]

Hmm.. weird, when I test it, it takes 0, 09s for Nim version (with -d:release flag). It could be slower on less powerful hardware, but not 58 times slower.

[iogilarb]

zang? a chinese programming language? 😅

[techduck]

You can see at 0:36 that he's only running `nim compile app.nim` with no `d:release` flag which explains the poor performance he's seeing.